Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp values < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Descriptive statistics Samples differed in average symptom endorsement: Patients in Data Set 4 had the most severe symptomatology, followed by Data Set 1, Data Set 2, and Data Set 3 (see Table 1 ). Except for the comparison of Data Set 1 with Data Set 2, t (840.15) = 1.62, p = .11, Bayes factor = 0.26, 3 all other differences between the severity scores were highly significant ( t values between 8.51 and 29.29, degrees of freedom between 518.03 and 1417.3, all p values < 2.2 × 10 −16 , all Bayes factors > 4.7 × 10 13 ).
highly significantp < 2.2×10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Supporting this hypothesis, a comparison of the mean coverage of the nuwt regions to that of the non-nuwt regions showed a small but highly significant difference between them (Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, p < 2.2×10 -16 for all 13 samples).
highly significantp < 2.2E-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Phenotypic variance decomposition and heritability of partial resistance to bacterial canker Considering differences between all controls and inoculated shoots regardless of the genotype effect, a highly significant effect of bacterial inoculation was observed (Wilcoxon unilateral t.test p < 2.2E-16) for lgc whatever the year and for bs in 2013 and 2015 (lesser extent in 2014 p < 9.77E-12 and 2016 p < 9.06E-06).
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A Wilcoxon rank sum test indicated a highly significant difference in fitness variation ( W = 3.2 × 10 8 and P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), supported by Welch’s t test, which showed a lower mean absolute fitness difference for closely related homologs compared to distantly related homologs ( t = −63.5, df = 7,020, and P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ; table S9).
highly significantp value = 2.2E−160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In addition, CREB1 is the top upstream regulator of the 465 overlapping differentially expressed genes (see previous texts) and there is a highly significant, negative correlation ( r = − 0.91, p value = 2.2E−16) between the fold changes for these genes—including the 58 direct CREB1 target genes—in the two comparisons (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).
highly significantP -value < 2.2e–160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Notably, while the in vitro and the denatured control samples slightly but significantly anticorrelated (average PCC = −0.07, Edgington-combined FDR-adjusted P -value = 3.3e–6), a moderate yet highly significant correlation was instead detected between the in vivo and the denatured control samples (average PCC = 0.18, Edgington-combined FDR-adjusted P -value < 2.2e–16).
highly significantP = 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The rescue of genes found differentially expressed in ∆ Firre CLPs by a Firre transgene produced a highly significant result ( P = 2.2e-16, Fisher exact test); however, we note that the widespread changes in gene expression observed in the CLPs from animals only expressing transgenic Firre RNA could also formally contribute to this effect.
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, the differences in length and Alu count of the downstream intron between the predominant A5BS circRNAs and the other A5BS circRNAs were highly significant ( P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ; Figure 4E , F ) while they were much less or not significant for the upstream flanking introns of A3BS circRNAs ( Supplementary Figure S5C, D ).