“highly significant”

Results Bacterial quantification The effect of extraction methodology on the concentration of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was highly significant (Repeated measures ANOVA, F = 61.5, P < 2 × 10 −16 ; Fig. 1 A).

Thus, although the number of substitutions in a partition is a highly significant ( P < 2e-16) predictor of passing or failing any of the tests, that it explains only about a quarter of the variation suggests that other factors, such as underlying differences in the extent to which partitions violate the SRH assumptions, are driving the remaining ∼75% of the variation.

The statistical analysis showed a highly significant evolution of the sugar ( p < 2 × 10 −16 ) and starch ( p < 1.339 × 10 −5 ) curves in function of the reaction time.

Vials of APSA stored on ice in the fridge for up to 22 months and then sampled at a dilution factor of 1/250,000 (DF 250,000) prior to assay showed extreme sample to sample variation in enzyme activity and a trend to lower OD values over time with a highly significant effect of the storage time on the detection limit (ANOVA p ≤ 2E-16, Regression p < 0.043) ( Fig. 2 A).

gondii /THP-1 conditioned media resulted in a highly significant (P = 2x10 -16 ) increase in H . hammondi vacuole size ( Fig 7C ).

We found that both RM and n sites had a highly significant effect (respectively, F 9,449 = 71, P < 2 × 10 −16 and F 1,449 = 103, P < 2 × 10 −16 ), and the interaction between RM and n sites was also significant ( F 9,449 = 8.99, P < 2 × 10 −16 ).

A model without interaction showed a highly significant effect of voxel on spectral quality ( Fig. 3 a ; F (1,79.12) = 183.73, p < 2 × 10 −16 ), with LO linewidth broader than EVC.

Laminar quantification showed a highly significant difference in Iba1 intensity across cortical layers [ F (4,531) = 90.19, p < 2 × 10 –16 ; one-way ANOVA] with the highest intensity in L1 ( Figure 7E ; L1 vs.

Highly significant associations (log-rank test, P < 2 × 10 –16 ) for all three variables were observed, in the whole series and in the two subsets (Fig. 1 ).

There was significant evidence of genome-wide selection for stripe rust resistance over the 11 years in the population, as demonstrated by a negative G ^ value ( G ^ = − 0.26) and a highly significant ( p = 2 × 10 –16 ) difference between the observed G ^ and the null distribution of 1000 permuted G ^ perm values (Fig. 3 A).

The variation in ancestry seen in the admixture maps of Figure 1 also result in highly significant correlations of the three ancestries with altitude of birthplace (p-values <2×10 −16 for the three ancestries): African and European ancestry decreases with altitude (r of −0.24 and −0.39, respectively), while Native American ancestry increases (r = 0.48).

The intersection is statistically highly significant (p < 2 -16 ).

Again, rs708727 was found to be a highly significant ( p < 2e−16) covariant of all probes, while rs960603 is not.

One interesting example is glycan 5402, which had a small positive correlation (PPMCC 0.28) with A1AT’s serum concentration when present at site A1AT site 70 ( P = 0.006) but had a strong highly significant negative correlation (PPMCC -0.81) with the serum concentration of A1AT when present at A1AT site 271 ( P < 2E−16) (Fig. 2 F).

The difference in this distribution was highly significant ( χ 2 p-value<2e-16).

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results (Supplementary Data 1 –Table B 3 ) showed a highly significant effect of landmarks on measurement variance ( p -value < 2 × 10 −16 ); however, no significant effect of the operator ( p -value = 1.00) or the interaction between landmark and operator was observed ( p -value = 0.968).

Statistical analysis via disk diffusion assays revealed highly significant differences in inhibition zone diameters among microorganisms ( p < 2 × 10 −16 ).

The first GLM, which included all values, returned a highly significant relationship between time spent in male germline and the observed substitution rates ( P < 2e-16; odd ratio 1.16, 95% CI: 1.1622–1.1626).

Indeed, the fit of all points rather than of the medians were poor although the (anti-)correlation was highly significant (R 2 = 0.01, p < 2e −16 in both cases).

There was a highly significant effect of time for both sides ( p < 2e-16).

Finally, note that RRF was actually so fast at small chunk sizes that there was a significant overhead associated with our parallelization of the algorithm (Methods), as linear models fitted to only chunk sizes less than 200 were highly significant ( P <2.00×10 −16 ), with negative slopes (Fig. 1 b).

A paired t-test confirms that this difference is evidently highly significant (p-value<2.10 -16 ).

Additionally, no effect of larvae stage was observed for NCR whereas the other factors were highly significant ( p value <2.10 −16 and 1.39.10 −8 for Paraquat concentration and NAC, respectively).

This difference is highly significant ( Figure 2A , Figure 2—figure supplement 1 , p-value<2.10 −16 ).

The haplotype (rs2004640T–rs2280714T) involved in both the alternative splice donor site and the elevated expression of IRF5 also had a highly significant association with SLE (pooled, P = 2.11 × 10 -16 ).