Barely Significant
← all phrases

“fell short of significance”

362 sentences · 362 papers · 438 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

fell short of significancep = .071.4× alphagold
Analyzing this further, a three-way (modality: within-modal visual, within-modal haptic, cross-modal visual-haptic and cross-modal haptic-visual; rotation; axis) RM-ANOVA again showed a main effect of object rotation (F 1,23 = 30.04, p = .001) but the axis of rotation was unimportant (F 2,46 = .39, p = .68), and the main effect of modality fell short of significance (F 3,69 = 2.49, p = .07).
fell short of significancep =0.0701.4× alphagold
Consequently, post hoc comparisons also fell short of significance, although the comparison related to ERN differences between PHOB group ( M = −4.64, SD = 4.22) and HC group ( M = −2.58, SD = 2.68) approached the threshold ( p =0.070).
fell short of significancep = 0.0701.4× alphagold
SPR for Brother John were also significantly correlated with all other rates (from SMT online pre-lab: r (45) = 0.37, p = 0.014) to clapping: r (53) = 0.57, p < 0.001), except walking ( r (49) = 0.26, p = 0.076), and those for Twinkle only fell short of significance with walking rate ( r (50) = 0.26, p = 0.070).
fell short of significancep = .071.4× alphagold
TAS-20 alexithymia showed only a weak negative correlation with MAIA-2 interoceptive sensibility that fell short of significance ( p = .07), but was significantly positively correlated with reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity, and negatively correlated with emotion regulation.
fell short of significanceP = 0.0711.4× alphagold
When using Steiger's Z ( Steiger, 1980 ) to compare the magnitude of the correlations between deliberate mind-wandering during slots and boredom proneness, r (109) = 0.047, P = 0.63, and deliberate mind-wandering during the vigilance task and boredom proneness, r (109) = 0.245, P = 0.009, we found that the differences in the magnitude of the correlations approached, but ultimately fell short of significance, Z = 1.80, P = 0.071.