Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not quite reach statistical significance”

680 sentences · 680 papers · 750 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.063

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Of the nine patients included in the study, ESWT improved healing in seven, as assessed by a decreased measurement of wound area in the patient at baseline before ESWT, and at two weeks post-shockwave therapy ( Figure 1 A), although this decrease did not quite reach statistical significance (mean values ± SEM, pre-treatment 93.53 ± 38.61; post-treatment 88.23 ± 37.40; p = 0.051).
In contrast, MG1655 vaginal wash titers and uterine histology scores suggest a different relationship in which higher bacterial numbers were seen alongside higher uterine inflammatory scores, but a positive correlation did not quite reach statistical significance ( P = 0.0512) ( Fig 7F ).
159 , 160 The effect of zoledronic acid on overall survival was reported to be independent of the reduction in SREs, suggesting more direct anti‐myeloma effects, 159 , 160 although a subsequent analysis of the data suggested this effect did not quite reach statistical significance ( p = .0515). 161 A meta‐analysis of eight randomised studies involving patients with early stage breast cancer suggested that adjuvant bisphosphonate use was associated with a reduction in the rate of breast cancer recurrence in the bone (relative risk 0.83, p = .004) and modest reduction in b
did not quite reach statistical significanceP value = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Among participants with detectable HBV DNA at year 7, the mean log 10 viral load was higher in those with A1896 (2.30 ± 1.66 IU/mL) than G1896 (1.76 ±1 IU/mL); although this difference did not quite reach statistical significance (P value = 0.052), but was clinically important.
The cross-informant agreement between parents and professionals was moderate, although it did not quite reach statistical significance with regard to assessing the children’s ability to recognise emotions from facial expressions (Pearson’s r (38) = 0.309, p = 0.052).