“close to the limit of significance”

Despite their large contribution to the total number of indels, excluding MSI tumors from the analysis yielded nearly identical lists of driver genes, with differences only on genes close to the limit of significance, as expected ( Figure S2 C).

Indeed, anti-transglutaminase levels were lower in CI than in CeD patients, but patients with CI nevertheless presented significantly higher anti-transglutaminase IgA levels than HC, whereas the differences in anti-transglutaminase IgG were close to the limit of significance.

Most of the differences between DA vs TA were close to the limit of significance (2 fold up or down), except lmo0901 for which the level of transcript after 30 min incubation in DA was 7.495 higher than in TA.

Subsequent association analyses indicated that three loci ( One2ASC , One19ASC and OmyFGT34TUF ) were strongly associated with spawning time (p < 0.0002) and a fourth locus, Oki10, was close to the limit of significance ( Table 3 ).

In terms of phenotypic similarity, species generally possess similarity values as defined by numerical taxonomy of >70%, which is close to the limit of significance [ 14 ].

Likewise, the differences between female and male students were very close to the limit of significance for questions numbers 10, 11 and 12.

A result close to the limit of significance was obtained only with the V25% value, this value may become significant with increasing the number of patients.

The reduced ribcage percentage contribution to the tidal volume of overall obese subjects was close to the limit of significance (Fig. 2 ).

However, the p-value for the category youngest child was very close to the limit of significance (0.042).

Value of Solids Depending on Test Conditions Regarding the test conditions, no significant differences can be seen; however, there are trends worth commenting on, as the p -values are low and close to the limit of significance.

On the other hand, although the area of visceral fat did not decrease significantly at the end of the study, a trend was observed with the LRC remaining close to the limit of significance.

Two other parameters, CBF-CBF min and pCO 2 , were close to the limit of significance.

No other effect was observed, and those listed were close to the limit of significance.

However, the P -values associated with these data were close to the limit of significance, raising questions about the specificity of these pathways.

There was no significant difference in the concentration of anti-VlsE IgG between periods II and III; however, the determined probability level ( p = 0.0561) was close to the limit of significance.

The same risk or protective explanatory variables were identified using both univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression, except for dyspnoea ( p -value was close to the limit of significance for the final regression modelling).

In the present study, we found that in comparison with the healthy control group and topical treatment group, moderate-to-severe AD patients treated with dupilumab had the shortest COVID-19-associated disease course, although p -value (0.046) from the dupilumab treatment group compared with the topical treatment group was close to the limit of significance, which may be explained by the small sample size.

It was a difference close to the limit of significance.

Rhinorrhea is also close to the limit of significance but not significant.

However, the effect of mean nodule size on nodule progression was found to be close to the limit of significance.

In addition, the risk of lymphovascular invasion was approximately 3 times higher in quartile 1 compared to quartile 4 (OR: 3.120, p=0.062), and although the difference was not significant, it was close to the limit of significance.

MRI measurements and calculations related to the ventricular volumes showed a significant increase only in SV, which was exclusive to the HUC-MSC group, although lesser degree of increases was also noted in the control and BM-MNC groups (close to the limit of significance).

( p = 0.0722) in group A, was close to the limit of significance.

of muscular weakness was very close to the limit of significance.

The time from the first physician consultation to the start of treatment was lower for patients who were referred to an MDT compared to non-MDT (mean 19.85 days versus 29.09 days, respectively; p = 0.043), even though the sample size was small and the result was close to the limit of significance [ 62 ].