Barely Significant
← all phrases

“clearly significantly”

181 sentences · 181 papers · 271 search hits before verification

In the literature

Immunohistochemical staining showed that, compared with the negative control group, cytoplasmic TRAF3 tumor staining in the overexpression group was decreased and the number of stained cells was clearly significantly reduced; while in the inhibition group, cytoplasmic TRAF3 tumor staining was increased and the number of stained cells significantly increased (Additional file 5 : Figure S5A, S5B).
nov., being separated in 100% of bootstrap replicates of the analysis, but clearly significantly closer to the samples classified within Orientia , compared with other rickettsiae in the sequence databases.
Endemic scrub typhus-like illness, Chile.
Emerg Infect Dis · 2011 · PMC3322051
The length of high-quality transcripts (approximately 97.16%) obtained in this study was almost greater than 1000 bp (Table 2 ), and this transcript length was clearly significantly higher than that obtained previously with second-generation sequencing 42 , which suggests that third-generation full-length transcriptome sequencing based on PacBio SMRT sequencing technology can compensate for the limitation of the short reading length observed with NGS and promote further in-depth study of P . wulianensis and its related species without reference genomes.
It is worth noticing that both t Li + values are noticeably close to unity and clearly significantly higher than standard liquid electrolyte containing salts, or RTIL-based electrolytes, or cationic PILs/Li salts and/or salt in polymers (e.g., PEO/Li), or composite electrolytes reported previously. 66 , 67 The main factor that can be attributed to the deviation of the transference number value from unity is the nonzero mobility of anchored anions, chiefly due to the presence of a flexible, long spacer between anchored anions and the main chain and the overall inherent motion of polyanionic block since the test was conducted at temperature far above T g .
Moreover, the present findings show that the response modality effect is specifically due to the fact that Stroop interference observed with vocal responses results from the significant contribution of task, semantic, and response conflicts, whereas only semantic and response conflicts clearly significantly contribute to Stroop interference observed with manual responses (no significant task conflict was observed).