“borderline significant”

Although pre-existing CPA was borderline significant in multivariate analysis of all-cause mortality (p = 0.0502), MAC-PD patients who developed CPA showed extremely poor prognoses (Fig.

A borderline significant difference was observed between CBP80-32 and the non-edited control under WD (p = 0.0502), suggesting a trend towards increased PDH expression in CBP80-32.

This was statistically higher (p=0.0002) compared with the medical student group (38%) and borderline significant (p=0.0503) compared with the postgraduate group (36%) ( figure 2C–D ).

VEGF also showed a similar profile, with the P value between LTBI and PTB being borderline significant ( P = .0503) ( Supplementary Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 1 ).

When adjusting for potential confounders, this was borderline significant ( P = .0503) but significant when adjusting only for likely confounders ( P = .025; Table S2 ).

SERPINA7 rs1804495 was borderline significant (P = 0.0503), perhaps due to a small sample size.

Analysis of primary endpoint in the sub-group who completed the questionnaire showed a borderline significant difference between the intervention group and the control group, Peto & Peto Wilcoxon test p = 0.05039.

A trend toward increasing age was observed across tertiles, with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.0504), while no significant differences were observed in weight ( p = 0.764) or sex distribution.

60%), with a borderline significant association (OR = 8.67, p = 0.0504), supporting the hypothesis that prolonged viral replication increases the risk of resistance development [ 22 ].

The difference between women and men was borderline significant, with a higher likelihood of positive results in women (OR 2.70; 95% CI: 0.96–7.62; P = 0.0504).

Excepting the 3-year follow-up, when just a borderline significant difference regarding the visual acuity between the Ex-PRESS and standard trabeculectomy group was observed ( p = 0.0504), the Ex-PRESS groups showed significantly better visual acuity at 6 weeks ( p = 0.0324), 1 year ( p = 0.0168), 2 years ( p = 0.0162), and 4 years ( p = 0.0111).

A supportive, but borderline significant trend was seen with lines with delayed courtship, none of which showed aggression (0 of 24, P = 0.0504, Pearson’s chi square).

For HOXA4 , the top DMR in WRN ‐mutant patients, the correlation between promoter methylation and age was borderline significant ( p = 0.0504).

However, the test for multivariate model was borderline significant ( P = 0.0505) ( S4 Table ).

Improvements in the digital health literacy scale (eHEALS) were borderline significant ( p = 0.0506) and significant for Dari speakers ( p < 0.05).

TSH was highest in HBsAg-negative individuals for both sexes, showing a borderline significant difference between groups ( p = 0.0507; Figure 4 a).

The nested effect of the source population within species (populations used for experiments) was also significant for body length (F 2, 97 = 13.78 P < 0.001) and borderline significant for total body length (F 2, 97 = 3.08 P = 0.0508), indicating that despite much variation across populations, D. parvula was consistently smaller than D. retrocurva .

However, light fruits were borderline significant in linear regression ( p = 0.051), we can’t conclude from our findings that there are real differences between light fruits and sleep quality.

In sex-stratified Cox models, the trajectory group × sex interaction was borderline significant (likelihood-ratio test χ2(2) = 5.97, P = 0.051), and the proportional hazards assumption was supported (global Schoenfeld test P = 0.91; Table S23).

Furthermore, using a paired t -test, we found a significant increase in pesticide safety practices ( p < 0.05) in the intervention group and a borderline significant increase regarding in-home safety ( p = 0.051) in the control group.

Latencies The latency of the wave in ring 1 mfERG in the affected eye was statistically significantly longer than the control eye after three months ( p = 0.011), while in rings 3 and 4, borderline significant, or significantly longer, latencies were observed in the affected eye at the first examination (ring 3 p = 0.051; ring 4 p = 0.044), and in rings 2 and 5 there was no significant difference in latencies between the affected and control eyes throughout the observed examinations ( Figure 4 ).

With adjustment for sex, age and SES in the final model, there was no increased risk of chronic pain, and no significantly increased risk of pain-related disability for those in the MA-group, but there was a borderline significant risk of pain-related disability in the HMA-group group compared with the H-group (OR = 2.35, CI 1.00–5.52, P = 0.051).

The difference-in-differences estimator result showed a 9% difference in clean cord care practices among the participants (p = 0.025), 12.2% in skin to skin care (p = 0.022), and borderline significant increase in early initiation of breastfeeding (10.5%, p = 0.051).

Furthermore, the probability of reporting higher loneliness in January 2021 (T4) than in April 2020 (T0) was borderline significant ( p = .051).

When dichotomizing age at the median (62 years), sNfL was perceived as useful in 60% of the youngest half of the cohort and in 48% of the oldest half of the cohort, which was borderline significant ( p = 0.051, Fig. 1 c).