“borderline significant”

Baseline IL-6 ( Table 4 , down) showed a borderline significant positive association with attention at baseline (TMT-A: β = 0.360, p = 0.050), which persisted as a trend at 5 years (β = 0.996, p = 0.052) and reached significance at 10 years (β = 0.568, p = 0.020).

Composition variation was also found among the HA subgroups (HA-1, HA-2, and HA-3), which was also not significant (all p > 0.05), with exceptions for Bacteroides uniformis and Mediterraneibacter gravus , which were borderline significant between HA-2 and HA-3 and between AD and HA-3 (both p = 0.05), respectively ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 ).

The main effect of Sex was borderline significant (f(1,25) = 4.28, p = .05, np 2 = .15) with females having a slightly higher SCR ( mean = .46) compared to males (mean = .29).

In females, we also found a borderline significant association of higher plasma IGF1 levels with cardiovascular mortality (0.43, 0.18–1.00; p = 0.05; see Supplemental Table S2 , Model 1), but neither a significant association with cancer-related mortality (1.50, 0.45–4.93; p = 0.51; see Supplemental Table S3 , Model 1), nor with mortality from miscellaneous causes (0.43, 0.10–1.78; p = 0.24; see Supplemental Table S4 , Model 1).

Overall time had a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05) for patients with a Q12-16 response (Table 3 , Fig. 5 ).

From the included studies, the latter was the only intervention that observed a borderline significant increase in total body aBMD ( p = 0.05).

Post hoc t -tests showed no difference between MDD and HC before treatment ( t (62) = −0.46, p = 0.644, Cohen’s d = 0.11), but a borderline significant difference after treatment ( t (62) = 1.99, p = 0.050, Cohen’s d = 0.51).

The HR for incident microalbuminuria was borderline significant after adjustment with diabetes duration, sex, HbA 1c , systolic blood pressure, and history of smoking (1.18 [1.00–1.39]), p = 0.05, however, neither this association was independent of triglycerides (HR 1.13 [0.93–1.34], p = 0.15).

7B-C , borderline significant, p = 0.05).

Because we observed significant or borderline significant interactions between total protein intake and sex on BF% ( p = 0.05), insulin ( p = 0.01), C-peptide ( p = 0.03), HDL-C ( p = 0.08), triglycerides ( p < 0.01), and the cardiometabolic score ( p = 0.07), we also performed all analyses in boy and girls separately (Table 2 ).

Pairwise-comparisons with adjusted p values (using the Bonferroni correction) are reported and demonstrate a borderline significant difference between the high AQ group and the ASD group (p = 0.05, r = 0.47; with lower levels of mu suppression in the ASD group).

There was a borderline significant improvement in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire score for multi-lead pacing vs. conventional CRT (MD −4.46, P = 0.05), but the difference was not significant when only patients receiving LV-only multi-lead pacing were included (MD −3.59, P = 0.25).

Our results showed a borderline significant difference between the two groups regarding 5STS ( p = 0.05).

A borderline significant ( P = .050) decrease in QAct scores was evidenced from baseline to the 3-month visit and remained stable ( P = .100) at 12 months.

Furthermore, metastatic disease was borderline significant as negative predictor for survival (metastatic vs. non-metastatic; 5.3 years vs. not reached; P = 0.05).

Responders presented lower level of Radscore at TP1 ( P < 0.01), and the difference was borderline significant in test set ( P = 0.05) ( Figure S2A ).

Those planning to deliver in military hospitals showed a borderline significant increase in CS preference (1.53 points; 95% CI: −0.02–3.08; p = 0.05).

For progression to NV, a similar effect of BMI for type 1 carriers versus noncarriers was not seen: the effect of BMI among carriers was not significant (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.2, 1.9; P = 0.33), whereas it was borderline significant among noncarriers (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.4; P = 0.05).

As shown in Figure 1 , the TG levels were significantly associated with HOMA‐IR ( P < 0.001), and the association of the LDL‐C/HDL‐C ratio with HOMA‐β was borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

There was a significant decrease in the reporting of neonatal sepsis ( p = 0.01) in the bivariate analysis, which remained only borderline significant in the multivariate model ( p = 0.05).

At this age, there was a borderline significant difference in the E2/E1 ratio with a higher ratio in the NR group [0.76 (0.45–0.95) vs. 0.34 (0.07–0.65); P = 0.050]; however, there were no differences in the E2 concentrations between the two groups; Figures 3A,B .

Evaluation of systemic markers of inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-8 and fibrinogen) only revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma hs-CRP concentration after doxycycline treatment (−0.51 μg/ml, P =0.050; Table 3 ).

Lastly, thrombocytopenia risk was non-significant for cabazitaxel versus other taxanes (RR = 1.47, 95% CI 0.76–2.83; I 2 = 0%) but borderline significant for C25 versus C20 (RR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.00–2.89; p = 0.05) (Fig. 9 ).

After excluding marital and employment statuses and living arrangement from the covariate list, the likelihood ratio test comparing models of covariates and vision (Covar + Vision) to covariates only (Covar Only) became borderline significant ( P = 0.05) for reading speed and was statistically significant ( P = 0.03) for balance.

VAS-based appetite ratings did not show significant changes in hunger, fullness, or desire to eat, but a borderline significant reduction was observed in prospective food consumption after pelemir-enriched bread ( p = 0.050).