For upper extremity strength there was a borderline significant multivariate time effect (F 3,36 = 2.87; p = 0.050; partial Eta 2 = 0.193) with significant univariate improvement for concentric (F 1,38 = 5.41; p = 0.025; partial Eta 2 = 0.125) and eccentric (F 1,38 = 6.58; p = 0.014; partial Eta 2 = 0.148).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In the transfemoral-access cohort, TAVI resulted in a borderline significant reduction in death from any cause or disabling stroke compared to SAVR (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62–1.00; p = 0.05).
Among 188 KPC-producing CRKP strains, multivariate analysis identified that traT (aHR = 3.12; p = 0.05, borderline significant) and capsular types (p = 0.02) were independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, irrespective of ceftazidime-avibactam usage (aHR = 0.38; p = 0.002), pneumonia (aHR = 1.84; p = 0.01), Pitt score (aHR = 1.27; p < 0.001) and traJ presence (aHR = 1.96; p = 0.48) (Table 5 ).
However, there was a borderline significant difference (p = 0.05) for pancreatic insufficiency: all patients included in the rapid group were pancreatic insufficient, while 15 of the 18 patients in the slow progression group were pancreatic insufficient.
There was a borderline significant difference in tumor size (P=0.05).
After adjustment for confounding by age, educational level, job demands and general health, the significant positive association between obesity and NFR observed in the unadjusted analysis (B = 13.45, 95%CI:4.03, 22.88, p = 0.005) changed into a borderline significant positive association (B = 8.77, 95% CI:0.01, 17.56, p = 0.05), with normal body weight as the reference category.
There was a negative borderline significant association between temperature and TIH risk (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56–1.00, p = 0.05).
However, when comparing all groups to the “night” subgroup, a borderline significant difference was found for malunion: 2/236 (0.9%) in the “all groups but night” group, compared with 2/26 (9%) in the “night” group ( p = 0.05).
A borderline significant correlation was present when exciting with 440 nm (r = 0.57, p = 0.05) and 750 nm (r = 0.55, p = 0.06).
When stratified by study designs, RCTs showed a significant effect in favor of MIS (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00–1.51; I 2 = 77%); however, the difference is borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
Statistical T Tests were conducted and the results show that there is a borderline significant difference between the average Weighted F1-scores of EEGNet and LSTM-EEGNet, which has t(5)=2.029; p-value=0.050 with .
The mean pH of the FW was 6.9, the observed difference between AA (6.7) and CA (7.1) was borderline significant (p = 0.05) when both genders were combined and significant in females alone (AA: 6.7, CA: 7.2; p < 0.05).
However, when aggregating AI knowledge into tech-savvy (categories “advanced” and “good”) vs non–tech-savvy (categories “basic” and “no knowledge”), there was a borderline significant association with geographical origin (Χ 2 = 7.65, df = 3, p = 0.05), with the most notable difference among responders from Southern Italy who rated themselves as tech-savvy (Pearson-adjusted standardized residuals +1.71).
In the present study, CRP levels were higher in deceased patients compared to survivors, although this difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
Perineural invasion showed a borderline significant difference in distribution among the groups (P=0.05).
27.9%; p = 0.014) and statins compared to the NP group, although the latter was borderline significant (44.0 vs 23.0%, p = 0.05).
There were also borderline significant differences between communities (adjusted r 2 = 0.02; p = 0.05).
This study found that patients with CeD, younger-onset diabetes, MS, asthma, and SLE were at higher risk of ALS, and the rate ratio for UC was borderline significant ( P = 0.05), and no significant difference was found for RA, psoriasis and CD.
In addition to the relationships described in Table 4 , there was a borderline significant ( P = 0.05) inverse relationship between serum sodium and fasting RMR (−87 ± 42 kcal/day for each mmol/L increase in serum sodium).
However, the GLM was only borderline significant for rubber tires ( Z = − 1.97, P = 0.05) but not plastic containers ( Z = − 0.80, P = 0.42) when analyzed separately.
116.7, p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 0.84, CI: 0.31, 1.36); and emotional well‐being, which is borderline significant (mean = 17.8 vs. 15.5, p = 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.5, CI: −0.01, 1.0).
There was a borderline significant difference by surgical technique in that new hernias were more frequent after thoracotomy (13.0%) than after a minimally invasive approach (6.4%; P = .05).
Furthermore, PFS analysis indicated that there was a borderline significant difference between the study groups when the time of PMA-ZEO usage was evaluated ( p = 0,05).
Moreover, in a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 106 patients with both NAFLD and T2DM who were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg ( n = 35), pioglitazone 30 mg ( n = 34), or placebo ( n = 37) for 24 weeks, only a borderline significant decrease in CAP score was observed with empagliflozin compared with placebo (−29.6 dB/m (−39.5 to −19.6) vs. −16.4 dB/m (−25.0 to −7.8), respectively; p = 0.05) [ 39 ].
In interaction analyses, no strong overall evidence of multiplicative interaction between current BMI category and alcohol drinking frequency was observed (overall interaction p = 0.503; Supplementary Table S6 ), although one individual interaction term for BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 combined with alcohol frequency of 2 times/week was borderline significant (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.00–27.73; p = 0.050).