Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
For upper extremity strength there was a borderline significant multivariate time effect (F 3,36 = 2.87; p = 0.050; partial Eta 2 = 0.193) with significant univariate improvement for concentric (F 1,38 = 5.41; p = 0.025; partial Eta 2 = 0.125) and eccentric (F 1,38 = 6.58; p = 0.014; partial Eta 2 = 0.148).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Among 188 KPC-producing CRKP strains, multivariate analysis identified that traT (aHR = 3.12; p = 0.05, borderline significant) and capsular types (p = 0.02) were independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, irrespective of ceftazidime-avibactam usage (aHR = 0.38; p = 0.002), pneumonia (aHR = 1.84; p = 0.01), Pitt score (aHR = 1.27; p < 0.001) and traJ presence (aHR = 1.96; p = 0.48) (Table 5 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
After adjustment for confounding by age, educational level, job demands and general health, the significant positive association between obesity and NFR observed in the unadjusted analysis (B = 13.45, 95%CI:4.03, 22.88, p = 0.005) changed into a borderline significant positive association (B = 8.77, 95% CI:0.01, 17.56, p = 0.05), with normal body weight as the reference category.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
However, when aggregating AI knowledge into tech-savvy (categories “advanced” and “good”) vs non–tech-savvy (categories “basic” and “no knowledge”), there was a borderline significant association with geographical origin (Χ 2 = 7.65, df = 3, p = 0.05), with the most notable difference among responders from Southern Italy who rated themselves as tech-savvy (Pearson-adjusted standardized residuals +1.71).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Moreover, in a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 106 patients with both NAFLD and T2DM who were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg ( n = 35), pioglitazone 30 mg ( n = 34), or placebo ( n = 37) for 24 weeks, only a borderline significant decrease in CAP score was observed with empagliflozin compared with placebo (−29.6 dB/m (−39.5 to −19.6) vs. −16.4 dB/m (−25.0 to −7.8), respectively; p = 0.05) [ 39 ].
borderline significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
In interaction analyses, no strong overall evidence of multiplicative interaction between current BMI category and alcohol drinking frequency was observed (overall interaction p = 0.503; Supplementary Table S6 ), although one individual interaction term for BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 combined with alcohol frequency of 2 times/week was borderline significant (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.00–27.73; p = 0.050).