“borderline significant”

The optimal growth increment model for females were improved by allowing for heterogenous variance between MPAs and control areas (ΔAIC = −3.14), with the variance being higher in the MPAs (18.5) than in control areas (13.6). For males, protection had a borderline significant effect on both skipped moulting ( figure 2 ; LRT: status × TL: L = 3.75, d.f. = 1, p = 0.05) and growth increment ( figure 3 ; LRT: status × TL: L = 4.07, d.f. = 1, p = 0.04).

A borderline significant correlation was present when exciting with 440 nm (r = 0.57, p = 0.05) and 750 nm (r = 0.55, p = 0.06).

2 c), and (2) pairwise PERMANOVA tests revealed a borderline significant difference only between NodFree and NodRich_A (F = 1.85, P = 0.05), which were also furthest apart (see Fig. 1 b).

Age was significantly positively correlated with ED values of the normal marrow cavity of P1 with DBSCT (Philips) ( p = 0.027, r = 0.36), and the correlation was borderline significant with SSDECT (Canon) ( p = 0.05, r = 0.33).

Among women, there was a borderline significant inverse association between obesity and DD (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33–1.00 p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).

However, we observed a borderline significant interaction ( p = 0.05) between BMI and T2D on cancer mortality.

There were no significant differences in demographic variables and cognitive assessment scores between the groups, except for a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.05) in the MOCA score (Supplementary Table 1 ).

Overall, the magnitude of mean change in CD4 + T cell-associated HIV-1 DNA was similar between baseline and all treatment time points with a borderline significant mean change in HIV-1 DNA levels from baseline to treatment week 4 being observed in the primary efficacy population (mean −0.21 log 10 copies/10 6 cells; p = 0.05) but not from baseline to week 12 (mean: −0.17 log 10 copies/10 6 cells; p = 0.13) as shown in Table S3 .

The test for within-pair independence for TKA in MZ males is borderline significant ( p = 0.05) compared with that of DZ male pairs ( p <0.0001), further indicating that a genetic influence in males may be rather insignificant.

The 11 men who had erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction as a plausible escitalopram side-effect had lower mean testosterone (13.8 ± 4.7 nM) and estradiol (0.084 ± 0.023 nM) than the men without the side-effects (19.6 ± 8.7 nM and 0.110 ± 0.034 nM), which was borderline significant for testosterone (Hedges' g = 0.81, t (18.9) = 2.1, p = 0.050) and significant for estradiol using Welch's tests (Hedges' g = 0.86, t (20.9) = 2.2, p = 0.039).

This study found that patients with CeD, younger-onset diabetes, MS, asthma, and SLE were at higher risk of ALS, and the rate ratio for UC was borderline significant ( P = 0.05), and no significant difference was found for RA, psoriasis and CD.

When adjusted for age and the number of comorbidities, the continuous cHIS score showed a borderline significant association with ICU mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.00–2.09, P = 0.050).

After adjusting for these three variables, the odds of live birth omission were 2.0 times greater for birth histories than for pregnancy histories and this was borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

Weak, borderline significant correlations in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters were observed for OPG with child length (r T2 = 0.33, r T3 = 0.28; p ≤ 0.05) and child weight (r T2 = 0.24, r T3 = 0.26; p T3 ≤ 0.10).

ActiGraph assessed MVPA also increased significantly (MVPA: B = 44.60, p = .006), whereas the increase in ActiGraph assessed days ≥30 min PA was borderline significant (B = 0.38, p = .05).

Although primiparous mothers had higher IgA concentration in colostrum (6.58 ± 1.30 g/L) than multiparous mothers (5.58 ± 1.50 g/L), yet the difference reached at borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

Moreover, in a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 106 patients with both NAFLD and T2DM who were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg ( n = 35), pioglitazone 30 mg ( n = 34), or placebo ( n = 37) for 24 weeks, only a borderline significant decrease in CAP score was observed with empagliflozin compared with placebo (−29.6 dB/m (−39.5 to −19.6) vs. −16.4 dB/m (−25.0 to −7.8), respectively; p = 0.05) [ 39 ].

Gender showed a borderline significant association, with females having half the odds of sleep insufficiency compared to males (OR = 0.5, 95% CI (0.3-1.0), p = 0.05).

After adjustment for baseline covariate differences, the least square mean change (standard error [SE]) in DSI was borderline significant in the incremental group (− 9.7 [4.8], P = 0.05) and it remained strongly significant in the conventional group (− 13.8 [5.0], P = 0.009).

Calibration assessment using logistic regression showed borderline significant underprediction of the true probabilities of non-arterial sample type overall (intercept = 0.31, p = 0.05), with mild underconfidence in predictions (slope 1.24, p < 0.01).

In the multivariate analysis, there was a borderline significant risk reduction of 20% with increased activity (aHR moderate 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05 and aHR high 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06).

The cross-level interaction between depressive symptoms and positive events on PA was borderline significant ( B = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p = 0.05).

Coffee with added sugar showed a significant positive correlation with Bifidobacterium (IVW method: OR = 1.56, 95% CI : 1.05-2.33, P = 0.03) and a borderline significant negative correlation with Veillonella (IVW method: OR = 0.65, 95% CI : 0.423–0.99, P = 0.05).

Home O 2 use was borderline significant after adjustment for these additional variables (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.99 - 3.04, P = 0.050.) Figure 1 demonstrates a Kaplan-Meir survival analysis showing a significant increase in all cause mortality in the home O 2 cohort with an overall mean (95% CI) survival time of 6.2 (5.9 - 6.5) years (P < 0.001).

The difference in mean triglyceride level in the placebo group was not significant after the intervention, although there was a borderline significant difference in the intervention group (p=0.05); nevertheless, the changes in mean triglyceride level between the two groups did not indicate a significant difference.