Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In the univariate analysis, the risk of PFD for the entire cohort was significantly affected by age >46 years (P=0.02), female gender (P=0.03), pathological stages II (P=0.04) and IIIA (P<0.001), tumor size >2.0 cm (P=0.009), number of positive lymph nodes ≥1 (P<0.01), NG1 (P=0.03), and NG2 (P=0.04), whereas the Ki-67 PI was borderline significant ( Table 5 ).
When data from these two studies of ICPP were pooled (heterogeneity test: Q = 0.08, df = 1, P = 0.77, I 2 = 0%), the overall analysis showed that the difference between FAHSDS and initial HSDS in the experimental cohorts was 0.4 SDS higher than in the control cohorts (95% CI = −0.01–0.81, Z = 1.94, P = 0.05), a borderline significant result ( Figure 4(c) ). 4.
The independent samples t -test showed that the gender difference in the positive emotion scores was borderline significant, with males (M = 33.00, SD = 7.05) having higher positive emotion scores than females (M = 31.90, SD = 6.36), while the gender differences in the scores of the remaining variables (including “lying flat” tendency, satisfaction of BPN, happiness index, and negative emotion) were not significant. 3.2.2.
Association between the research variables, intention to seek MHO help, and actually consulting an MHO The variables regarding differences between soldiers who actually consulted an MHO and those who did not (Table 4 ) that were found significant or borderline significant were inserted into GLMs together with the outcome variables of intention to seek help and actually seeking MHO help.
The important predictors in the linear model ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p < 0.05$$\end{document} p < 0.05 ) are mother, father and mgm for all imputation methods, except PCA where the mgm is borderline significant.
We observed significant association between self-reported thyroid disorders and ASVs in Model 1 (β = −8.6, 95% CI: −15.9, −1.3) and Model 2 (β = −9.2, 95% CI: −17.2, −1.2); however, when additionally adjusted for urinary iodine status and periodontitis, the association became borderline significant in Model 3 (β = −8.2, 95% CI: −17.2, 0.8).