“borderline significant”

Correlation with MMP9 was only borderline significant ( r = 0.3036, p = 0.046).

Likewise, the effect of higher BMI on MS after adjustment for IL-6 signaling remained, though this direct effect is considerably smaller in effect size and only borderline significant compared to the total effect obtained in the univariable analyses without adjustment for IL-6 signaling (MVMR: OR = 1.16, 95% CI =1.00-1.34, p = 0.046) ( Figure 3 ).

In multivariable analysis, CRT‐ON increase d the proportion of patients reaching the primary end point in QRSd/LVEDV Q1–Q3 (31.7% in CRT‐ON [n=300] versus 24.8% in CRT‐OFF [n=290]; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07–2.02; P =0.016), but decreased it in QRSd/LVEDV Q4 (death/HF hospitalization, 20.9% in CRT‐ON [n=91] versus 28.3% in CRT‐OFF [n=106]; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.34–1.24; borderline significant test for interaction P =0.046).

However, this association was borderline significant (p=0.046) and may be influenced by multiple testing considerations.

Additionally, there was a higher frequency of elevated aTG in TS patients, although this difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.046).

Smoking history showed a borderline significant association with IIEF-5 scores ( F = 4.00, P = 0.04603).

With this approach, no significant differences were identified, except for a borderline significant effect of the interictal sensititvity (t(108) = 2.016, p = 0.0462).

Although differences were borderline significant (p = 0.0462) between groups, the change within groups before and after the study were subtle and within normal range.

The association with WMH progression remained borderline significant after further adjustment for vascular risk factors, baseline cortical CMIs, and other CeVD markers (OR = 2.10 [1.03, 4.50], p = 0.047). 3.6.

For net affect, the p values of the estimates at 12:00 and 13:00 were borderline significant ( p = 0.047 and 0.046, respectively).

The Tracy-Wisdom test was borderline significant for the first PC (p = 0.047) and non-significant for the second (p = 0.331).

The borderline significant change detected in Jackson’s cross cylinder power vector component at 45° (unadjusted p = 0.047) is explained by a significant increase in older subjects with low to mid-range initial J45 values; values in younger subjects and in those with mid to high-range baseline readings did not change with advancing age (Fig. 2 ).

However, CD14 low PMφ showed a moderate positive relationship with the pain score that was borderline significant ( Fig. 4 , All, P = 0.047).

For example, the relationship between hand surface area and dry-time reached statistical significance for only one of 3 application volumes evaluated and was borderline significant ( p = 0.047) across the entire data set.

BMI showed a borderline significant association with d -dimer levels ( p = 0.047) with an odds ratio of 0.982 (95% CI 0.964, 1.000).

Although one-way ANOVA indicated a borderline significant main effect in the DH (F (2,17) = 3.675, p = 0.047), post hoc testing did not confirm any significant pairwise differences between the control and experimental groups.

As shown in Table 2 , 14-MEDAS scores were associated with most of the SWB items in a statistically significant way, while the association with BMI was borderline significant ( p = 0.047).

We repeated this analysis with syn_upM frequencies to test whether these results reflect the importance of secondary structure per se or geographic effects; syn_upM regressions were borderline significant for BIO1 ( P = 0.047) but not for BIO6 ( P = 0.052), BIO11 ( P = 0.062) or other bioclimatic variables.

In contrast, vaccination with Ty21a resulted in a borderline significant increases in anti-LPS IgG only ( p = 0.047, ANCOVA).

14.5% among non-users), this association was only borderline significant ( p = 0.047 before correction, p = 0.067 after), highlighting the need for further research with larger samples.

We were not able to find heterogeneity according to the study design, except for a borderline significant result within retrospective population-based case-control studies (2 = 11.23; df = 5; p = 0.047).

The unsupervised hierarchical clustering of these tumors results in two main branches; the distribution of metastases as first event between these two main branches shows a borderline significant difference; 3/28 (11%) patients in the left branch developed distant metastases versus 14/43 in the right branch (33%), P value = 0.047.

Resampling analyses indicated that the observed high TE var of OXPHOS complex IV subunits was borderline significant ( P = 0.047), whereas the TE var of OXPHOS complex V subunits showed higher significance ( P = 0.004).

However, a borderline significant difference (P = 0.047) was observed when comparing the incidence rate of TD between the patients who received regular IFN-α-based therapy (8.4%) and the patients receiving Peg-IFN-αbased therapy (13.7%).

However, the ssGSEA-based TIS had at least borderline significant correlation with both of these variables despite the small number of samples ( p = 0.047 for the correlation with IHC-based T cell counts and 0.057 for the correlation with total TCRb read counts) (Fig. 7b , middle and right panels).