“borderline significant”

In general linear models fit better than the log-linear model, as shown by the AIC statistics (Table 2 , Additional file 1 : Table S2). Table 3 demonstrates that there is at best borderline significant variation of excess absolute risk by time since exposure ( p = 0.279) or with age at exposure ( p = 0.085); this contrasts with more pronounced and significant variation of relative risk both with time since exposure ( p = 0.034), and with age at exposure ( p = 0.012) with relative risk particularly large for the period 10–14 years after UVR exposure and for exposures under the age of 25 (Table 4 ).

JTL was not associated with tarsus length in either sex ( p males = .89 and p females = .08, Table 1 (though this effect was borderline significant for females)), or with body condition or group size (all p > .30; Table 1 ), and there was no interaction between tarsus length and island‐wide insect abundance ( p > .08; Table 1 ).

For the CIVIQ-20, this was borderline significant (standardised β coefficients of re-intervention: −0.2 for SF-36 PCS, p = .30; −0.4 for SF-36 MCS, p = .030; and 0.4 for CIVIQ-20, p = .051).

When the day 28 PCR-corrected cure rates were analysed by country, the heterogeneity test was borderline significant at the 10% level only in the ePP population (ITT: p = 0.324; ePP: p = 0.082), suggesting some minor differences among sites ( Figure 2 ).

The relationships between miR-144-5p and two depression scores at baseline, HADS-D (β=-0.02, p=0.02) and PHQ-9 (β=-0.02, p=0.06) were also significant or borderline significant, whereas the association with HADS-A score (β=-0.01, p=0.37) was non-significant (Table S2c) .

Sometimes, the result is borderline significant (p = 0.42).

However, there was a borderline significant increased risk for death due to any cause among patients who had not received AI treatment, but this was only found in the multivariable model (log rank, P =0.43; adjHR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.01–3.26).

The results showed that testosterone levels were decreased (borderline significant) in postmenopausal depression patients compared with healthy controls (Z = 1.92, p = 0.5), while between-study heterogeneity was totally absent ( I 2 = 0%, and p = 0.05) ( Figure 4 ).

For elbow flexion trials there was a borderline significant positive correlation for antagonist EMG increase (Δant E ) with maximum velocity (Δω, r = .583, p = .500) departure, but no significant correlation with acceleration (Δα, r = .333, p = .190) departure.

Conversely, in the study based in Japan ( n = 84), with women supplemented during pregnancy and lactation with FOS or a placebo, a borderline significant difference in the number of Bifidobacteria in the intervention group compared to the control group ( P = 0.50), and an increased number of Bifidobacterium longum species were detected ( P = 0.01) [ 31 ]. 3.5.

Treatment group was borderline significant (p = 0.51) For GI toxicity the significant variables on univariate analyses were: a Gleason score ≥ 7 (p = 0.050) and baseline symptoms of grade ≥ 1 GI toxicity (p = 0.021).

The correlation between CD20 and diffuse fibrin depositions and the correlation between the intensity of intervillositis and CD68 were borderline significant ( p = 0.513 and p = 0.053, respectively) [ Table 6 ]. 4.

3.0 ± 1.6, P = 0.086) with borderline significant difference, but it tended to be deteriorated in the PBR group (2.9 ± 1.7 vs. 2.5 ± 1.8, P = 0.531).

Moreover, anxiety ( p = 0.05) was borderline significant, while depressive symptoms ( p = 0.54) and perceived stress ( p = 0.86) were not significant.

In addition, a meta-analysis of the 7 studies reporting daily steps showed that the eHealth interventions increased the number of steps taken by older adults compared to the control group (SMD 0.21, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.44; P =.06), corresponding to an average estimate of 597 steps, with borderline significant results and low heterogeneity ( I 2=0%; P =.64; Figure S1E in Multimedia Appendix 6 ).

328 dyn×sec×cm -5 [IQR 208–491]; p = 0.021)) and borderline significant higher meanPAP (35mmHg [IQR 29–47 vs. 27mmHg [IQR 23–36]; p = 0.65), lower 6-MWD (275m [IQR 327–431] vs. 429m [IQR 371–447]; p = 0.077) at the 6-MFU.

There is a borderline significant different in the pattern of gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) between groups, despite no systematic trend by level ( P = 0.79). 3.1.

The most significant differences among the different centers include the age of the patients ( p = 0.009), the sites of infection ( p < 0.001), and the proportion of ICU admissions for medical or surgical pathology ( p = 0.058), with a borderline significant value, whereas the severity of the cases did not differ among the centers ( p = 0.799); the lack of precise enrollment criteria likely accounted for these variations.

For men, in the multivariable analysis, TPHA positivity (OR 3.1, CI 1.3-7.2) remained significant and being widowed (OR 6.3, CI 1.3-29.1; p = 0.08) borderline significant; however HIV status (OR 1.2, CI 0.3-4.0; p = 0.8) and older age (OR 1.1, CI 0.4-2.8; p = 0.8) were no longer associated with HTLV-1 infection.

Differences in basal respiration ( P = 0.074) and ATP production ( P = 0.078) between groups were borderline significant, whereas nonmitochondrial respiration was similar ( P = 0.881).

The results showed that the mode of delivery was a borderline significant risk factor for biliary atresia (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00–1.30; I 2 = 0%, P = 0.926) ( Figure 5 ).

Notably, the contour funnel plot revealed a borderline significant change in the muscle mass in the patients who received an SGLT2 inhibitor in five studies (0.1 < p ≤ 1.0), whereas significant reductions were observed in two studies (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1 and 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, respectively) (Figure 3b ).

Of the ten SNPs for which IPD and PCSS models disagreed, nine occurred when one approach found a SNP to have a significant effect while the other found it to have a borderline significant effect ( α ≤ p < 10 α ). 4 Discussion We have developed a method that approximates the covariance of products of phenotypes with other variables using only bivariate and univariate pre-computed summary statistics (PCSS).

Participants with high MVPA but in the highest tertile of SED, showed a more than 2-fold increased risk of MetS, however only borderline significant.

In a registry-based nation-wide Swedish cohort of almost 7 million subjects followed for 3.5 years, montelukast use was associated with a borderline significant protective effect on recurrent stroke [ 73 ].