“borderline significant”

Smoking, histology, stage, Δdyspnea, MLD, and V20 were borderline significant (p < 0.1).

Among all 16 drugs with transporter information in DrugBank, the annotated transporters for six of them were significantly enriched (p < 0.05) in the predictive features, and three additional drugs had borderline significant enrichment (p < 0.1, Fig. 5 ).

Both significant (p-value < 0.05) and borderline significant (0.05< P < 0.10) predictors derived by these univariate analyses were entered in multiple multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the independent predictors of subsequent progressive joint damage.

Delivery method [normal vaginal delivery (NVD) to Caeserean section] was borderline significant ( p <0.10).

Variables that were borderline significant (0.05 < P < 0.10) were included in the multivariate analysis.

Conversely, cartilage is only statistically significant in the MCID-based model, and while borderline significant (p<0.10) in the MPCI-based model, there it presents less than half the added risk seen in the MCID-based model.

Using MS they find no change in serum T or DHT in the statin-treated arm, a borderline significant decrease in canonical adrenal products (pregnenolone, 17-OH pregnenolone, DHEA, androstenedione (AED); 0.05 < p < 0.10) that was lost after controlling for false discovery, and a significant 35% decrease in the non-canonical adrenal androgen 11-Keto AED (11KAED; p = 0.001).

If p < 0.05, the effect estimates were considered statistically significant, and borderline significant if p < 0.10 [ 46 ]. 2.2.5.

The day after symptom onset (comparing day 1 postonset with days 2 and 3) was associated with a significant decline in viral RNA shed into fine aerosols ( P < 0.05 for day 2 and P < 0.01 for day 3 in adjusted models), a borderline significant decline in coarse-aerosol shedding ( P < 0.10), and was not associated with a significant change in shedding detected in NP swabs ( P > 0.10).

In the case of borderline significant effects ( p < .10), the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the mean difference will be reported (Hackshaw and Kirkwood 2011 ) to prevent the dismissal of clinically meaningful results due to a small sample.

Statistically significant and borderline significant variables ( P < 0.1) were included for the adjustment in the multivariate Cox regression model and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated along with their corresponding 95% CIs as a measure of association.

The associations remained significant in the fully-adjusted model for both higher residential attachment (β=-0.02, p < .05) and higher neighborhood trust (β=-0.06, p < .001), although the association with residential attachment was borderline significant ( p < .10) controlling for sociodemographic factors and/or lifestyle factors (Table 2 ).

However, the multivariate study using logistic regression revealed that only pN1b had a borderline significant association with the presence of the BRAF V599E mutation (P = 0.101).

However, the association between overexpression of nuclear SOX4 and disease-free survival was only borderline significant ( P = 0.102, Figure 3 ).

However, it is important to specify that the coefficient of the unfiltered claim is borderline significant ( p = 0.103).

Regarding brain volumes, while differences in total brain volume were not statistically significant between iNPH and controls, a borderline significant difference was detected between iNPH and AD groups (mean difference = 51.74, SE = 24.15, p = 0.103).

Being younger or a smoker was associated with increased overreporting, while English language preference was borderline significant for overreporting ( P = 0.103).

The association in men was borderline significant (adjPR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.95, p = 0.103).

While PZ-ratio was only significantly correlated with PCa but only on a borderline significant level with significant PCa ( p = 0.105), further multivariable logistic regression models including base model (age, PSAD, %fPSA) and base model + PZ-ratio, base model + MRI, base model + PZ-ratio + MRI for PCa and significant PCa, respectively, were listed in Supplementary Table 4 .

When early response was added to these models the association with survival was not significant for DFS and only borderline significant for EFS (DFS: HR for early response corrected for age 1.75, 95% CI: 0.89–3.46, P = 0.105; EFS: HR for early response corrected for age and WBC count category 1.53, 95% CI: 0.98–2.39, P = 0.062), indicating that part of the association between early response and survival that was found in the univariate analyses could be explained through its association with other risk factors. 4.

Furthermore, a borderline significant association was found in an age and sex adjusted model of OPRM1 and opioid sensitivity (r = 0.188, adjusted R 2 = 0.035 p = 0.106).

The association between HbA1c during the third trimester and cesarean section was borderline significant (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04 per 0.1% increase; P = .108).

The difference in birth weight for infants of nonsmokers ( n = 656) in the highest versus lowest quartile of acrylamide Hb adduct levels remained statistically significant after adjustment for ethylene oxide adducts (–142 g; 95% CI: –246, –38 g), whereas the corresponding difference was borderline significant for glycidamide Hb adducts (–82 g; 95% CI: –182, 17 g; p = 0.11).

After controlling for educational level, marital status, employment status, the presence of young children within the household, health insurance status, and regular doctor visits, a borderline significant disparity in mammogram compliance was observed between Haitian and NHB households (adjusted odds ratio = 1.63, P = 0.11).

There were borderline significant differences in the proportions inside and outside the LEZ using bus & walk ( p =0.110) and walking ( p =0.054), but these comparisons were based on few respondents.