Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp -value = .04500.9× alphagold
Comparing AIC values between the linear model (AIC = 3147) and the generalized additive model (AIC = 3072) confirmed that the additive model provided a better fit to the data, with p -value < .0001 for person-level ambient temperature, and a borderline significant effect of age ( p -value = .0450 with an effect size of 2.1% increase in sedentary time for every 10 years of age).
borderline significantp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
However, for CD, the numerical trend toward lower estimates with increasing cumulative DDD category was more pronounced, with the highest category [>1500 DDD] yielding a multivariable OR of 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41–0.79]. We additionally ran analyses for cumulative statin dose excluding the small number of statin users where total DDD was truncated [ Supplementary Table 3, available as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online ]. The results were similar to those of our main analysis although, for CD, the test of linear trend was borderline significant [ p = 0.045]. 3.3.
borderline significantp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
Genetic model analysis revealed a borderline significant association ( p = 0.045 ) of this variant under dominant model, however the results were not significant after applying corrections for confounders like age, sex and family history (p corr = 0.181). -509C > T TGFB polymorphism revealed significant association with PACG The allele and genotype frequency distribution along with genetic model analysis for PACG cases and controls are given in Table 2 .
borderline significantP = 0.0450.9× alphagold
There was a borderline significant correlation between increasing duration of preoperative mTLE and clusters of maximum shape change in the ipsilateral ( r = −2.1, P = 0.045) and contralateral ( r = −2.09, P = 0.052) thalami across all patients, but not when corrected for patient age ( P = 0.21 and P = 0.36, respectively).
borderline significantP = 0.0450.9× alphagold
The relationship between FPV-based dietary pattern scores and increased risk of LGA became significant in the adjusted model as well as the unadjusted model, and there was a borderline significant relationship between FPV-based dietary pattern scores and risk of macrosomia ( P = 0.045).
borderline significantp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
For LnLF there was a borderline significant group ( p = 0.045) effect with lower levels in the PTSD group and a significant time effect ( p = 0.006), with LnLF decreasing at 10–15 min ( p = 0.051) and 20–25 ( p = 0.046) min post-exercise compared with pre-exercise levels.
borderline significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Interestingly, samples from Sophie exhibited a non-uniform distribution for the Pvmsp-1 F2 gene (p<0.001), with a high prevalence for one specific RFLP-profile and also for the Pvmsp-3α gene, two more common RFLP-profiles could be observed in the non-uniform distribution, although borderline significant (p = 0.046).
borderline significantP = .0460.9× alphagold
Three studies ( Supplementary Material; Hoffman 1986, Gasem 1995, Wain 2008 ) previously examined the relationship between sample volume and blood culture sensitivity directly, but one of these studies did not find conclusive evidence to support the hypothesized relationship ( Supplementary Material, Gasem 1995 ) and another ( Supplementary Material, Hoffman 1986 ) was borderline significant ( P = .046 by Pearson’s χ 2 test).