Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Borderline significant associations for high ( vs. low) job strain in the group with domestic overload were also observed for sleep systolic BP (16.9 mm Hg, p = 0.09), 24 h diastolic BP (12.9 mm Hg, p = 0.055), home diastolic BP (13.6 mm Hg, p = 0.07) and sleep systolic BP (20.5 mm Hg, p = 0.082).These findings suggest the existence of interaction between domestic overload and stress at work since much smaller (and non-significant) differences in mean BP due to high job strain were observed for workers with low domestic workload.
borderline significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
The difference in hip Z scores was borderline significant (mean -0.28 ± 1.03 vs 0.00 ± 1.00, p = 0.09), whilst RF per se did not impact on either spine or hip BMD loss (adjusted ORs (95 % CI) 2.14 (0.85 to 5.39) and 1.58 (0.62 to 4.05) respectively) (Fig. 1 ).
borderline significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
No significant associations were found between levels of estradiol and total abdominal and stabilizing muscle radiodensity (Tables 2 , 3 ), but there was a borderline significant association between estradiol and abdominal locomotor muscle radiodensity ((Model 1: 0.27, − 0.0 to 0.6, p = 0.09: Model 2: 0.28, − 0.0 to 0.6, p = 0.07; Model 3: 0.26, − 0.0 to 0.6, p = 0.09) (Table 4 ).
borderline significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Gut microbiome profiles are affected by total IgG levels at baseline In addition, we studied whether total IgG levels at baseline were associated with specific microbiome profiles, since we observed a borderline significant association with spike IgG levels in our cohort ( p = 0.09).
borderline significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
There was a borderline significant increase (p = 0.09) in translation frequency for FISH analyses when nodules were pre- sent (0.66%), compared to the absence of nodules (0.54%).
Afterword
Environ Health Perspect · 1997 · PMC1469935
borderline significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Several other factors had also a borderline significant association with survival: Age with a cut-off value at 60y (74m below 60y vs . 43m above, p = 0.09), History of t-MDS (27m with vs . 44m without, p = 0.09), absence of response to LEN (51m without vs . 37m with, p = 0.06), and prior treatment with HMAs (35m with vs . 45m without, p = 0.14).
borderline significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Furthermore, separate exploratory analyses at follow-up showed that men had a lower HADS total score compared with women (β = −2.04, 95% CI −3.60 to −0.47, p = 0.01), and there was a borderline significant reduction in HADS total score per unit increase in age (β = −0.08, 95% CI −0.16 to 0.01, p = 0.09).
borderline significantp=0.091.8× alphagold
After inclusion of other known predictors for poor long-term outcome (RF and baseline damage) in a multivariate logistic regression model, the baseline MBDA score was borderline significant as an independent predictor for progression of joint damage (OR=1.033, 95% CI 0.995 to 1.072, p=0.09) next to RF (OR=1.768, 95% CI 0.396 to 7.885, p=0.46) and baseline joint damage (OR=4.213, 95% CI 0.878 to 20.211, p=0.07).
borderline significantP=0.091.8× alphagold
Conversely, patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy were compared to those who did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy, and a significantly decreased risk of death was observed in the BD1 subgroup (HR =0.265, 95% CI: 0.075–0.932, P=0.03), and a borderline significant decreased risk of death was observed in the BD2 subgroup (HR =0.337, 95% CI: 0.096–1.185, P=0.09).