“borderline significant”

374.19 ± 615.97 pg/mL displayed as a percentage of the baseline, p = 0.001, Figure 2 B) as subgroup δ displays a borderline significant p -value (199.26 ± 75.73 vs. 225.12 ± 79.13 pg/mL, p = 0.085, Figure 2 B).

A two-way between-subject multivariate analysis of variance indicated a significant Condition effect, F (10,154) = 2.418, p = 0.011; Wilks’ Λ = 0.747, and a borderline significant interaction effect between BMI percentile and Condition on the combined dependent variables, F (10,154) = 1.702, p = 0.085; Wilks’ Λ = 0.811.

Obviously, more participants in the substantial exposure to COVID-19 group had contracted a COVID-19 infection (22.5 versus 9.1%), which was borderline significant ( P = 0.085).

Regarding GI surgery due to IBD, more patients with the GT genotype underwent surgical treatment compared to GG homozygotes ( Figure 2B ), although this difference was borderline significant before statistically correction ( p = 0.0851, p adj . = 0.2389, Table 3 ).

Analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated a significant interaction term between sex and origin (p = 0.038), and a borderline significant interaction term between BMI and origin (p = 0.086).

Smokers displayed a borderline significant lower prevalence of atrophy than non-smokers (5.6% vs 8.3%, p=0.086).

However, in Model 3, after full adjustment for covariates including education level, BMI, lifestyle factors, and metabolism-related indicators, the association strengthened considerably, with the TyG index showing a borderline significant relationship with glaucoma risk (Model 3: OR = 3.79, 95% CI: 0.98–20.53, P = .086).

Although the difference in diagnostic performance between oblique and true axial T2WI for the entire study population was only significant for R1 ( p = 0.027) and not for R2 ( p = 0.153), in the subgroup with tumors > 2.5 cm, the difference was statistically significant for R1 ( p = 0.046) and borderline significant for R2 ( p = 0.086).

However, results of Arab Board part 1 were borderline significant in predicting the result of the Arab Board Clinical Exam ( p = 0.086).

Determinants of e` On univariate analysis in control subjects, all the regional LV e`were inversely correlated with age (p<0.004 for all), whereas an inverse correlation of RV e`with age was borderline significant (p = 0.086).

An increase in T‐score of 3.2 in Conscientiousness was only borderline significant ( P = 0.086).

In the multivariate model, the FANCM c.5101C > T mutation is only borderline significant ( p = 0.086), however the hazard ratios remain consistent.

The difference in distribution of lesions with HPV16 compared to HPV non16 over clusters 1 and 2 was borderline significant ( p = 0.086), with 87.5% of lesions with HPV16 belonging to cluster 1.

In a sensitivity analysis of participants age 70 years and over, there was a borderline significant ( p = 0.086) HCTZ use by high sun exposure interaction, suggesting modestly increased HCTZ risk in older, high sun exposure adults.

When only healthy boys were included, association of TBT with weight gain when comparing the third category to first category was only borderline significant (p = 0.086).

When individuals with ATSs and individuals with ketamine in their systems were examined separately, a prominent age acceleration was found among those deceased individuals with the presence of any ketamine ( n = 7) in both the NAcc (an increase of 16.1 years in the median; P value = 0.003) and the PFC (an increase of 13.9 years in the median; P value = 0.006), and a borderline significant age acceleration among those deceased individuals with the presence of any ATS ( n = 9) in both the NAcc ( P value = 0.086) and the PFC ( P value = 0.056).

As in other research, depression was also found to be related to pre-eclampsia at a borderline significant level ( p = 0.086).

However, there is only a borderline significant increasing trend of ALL incidence with UVR cumulative radiant exposure, with RR = 1.444/MJ/cm 2 (95% CI 0.949, 2.197, p = 0.0865), although there are significant increasing trends of ALL with UVR cumulative radiant exposure among Hispanic boys ( p = 0.0337) and girls ( p = 0.0133) (Table 3 ).

While the analysis was borderline significant (F (1) = 2.93, p = 0.0867), Radiomics-only models showed a trend toward reduced performance (DOR: 8.254, p = 0.089), with a slight reduction in between-study variance (σ2 = 0.328).

However, the difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.087).

For brain MRI activity, higher rates of developing new lesions, albeit borderline significant, were found in those with lower GCIP-z (HR [95% CI] = 1.55 [0.92–3.03], p = 0.087).

Nevertheless, if PVR was excluded from the multivariate cox regression, high PVRL2 expression represented a negative prognostic marker for RFS ( p = 0.017), and had a borderline significant negative impact on OS ( p = 0.087; see Table 1 for hazard ratios).

A ~35% reduction was observed in the pyriproxyfen treatment, which was borderline significant compared to the control ( z = −2.348, p = 0.087).

There was a borderline significant difference toward greater depletion of B-cell precursors during treatment in the BCMA vs GPRC5D groups ( P = .087; supplemental Figure 9 ).

An exploratory analysis revealed a borderline significant correlation between PRKD3 protein expression and MMR status (pMMR vs. dMMR; p = 0.087).