“borderline significant”

Effects of IHH and PTCH1 Levels on Survival Log-Rank tests suggested a borderline significant survival difference for high versus low expression of IHH ( P value = 0.0807).

In fact, the blue curve representing the edema kinetics of the aP2-ALOX15 mice, was consistently below the green curve recorded for wildtype mice and statistical evaluation of the experimental raw data indicated a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.0808, see Fig. 3 ).

The odds of sadness were highest for those with severe cognitive impairment who were physically aggressive daily (OR = 2.16, P = .002) and lower for those physically aggressive 1 to 3 times per week (OR = 1.45, P = .023) or 4 to 6 times per week (OR = 1.45, P = .081, borderline significant).

In the dCA1, two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect for the J + A exposure (F(3,67) = 5.193, p = 0.026) and a borderline significant effect for both EE exposure and the J + A and EE interaction (EE: F(3,67) = 2.56, p = 0.081; Interaction: F(3,67) = 2.462, p = 0.071).

After univariate analysis of prefreezing parameters, the PR, TM, VCL, VSL, VA P , and ALH values showed significant differences while sperm concentration showed a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.081) between PFE and GFE samples.

Eighty percent of children of mothers who had not attended university had consumed a snack food product on the previous day, as compared with 66.7% of children of mothers who had attended university; this was borderline significant ( P = 0.081).

In univariate Cox analysis, only CAF attained a borderline significant P value (HR = 2.42, 95% CI 0.9–6.55, P = 0.081, Figure 10D ).

In a multivariate analysis, the statistical independence of the association between %emBNP and LV functional recovery from HF aetiologies was borderline significant ( P = 0.081).

In the case of anti-MICA antibodies, the association with ICI was borderline significant ( p = 0.081) ( Figure 7 ).

After PSM, the 1-year OS and GS of 81.3% and 81.3% in the FSLT group were lower than those of 90.6% in the WLT group, with borderline significant differences and a statistical power of 19.2% ( P = 0.081).

In the final model including early and current life factors, the lowered odds of being overweight associated with increased breastfeeding duration remained, whereas the association with normal birth weight was in the same direction but borderline significant ( P = 0.081) after adjusting for maternal BMI.

In the fully adjusted model, the phosphorus-protein ratio showed a significant nonlinear association with all-cause mortality ( p for nonlinearity = 0.027), while the nonlinear association with cardiovascular mortality was borderline significant ( p = 0.081).

BMI in this model was borderline significant (p = 0.081).

One extra adverse life event increased the risk of depressive symptoms by 57% ( p = .005) only in the L′L′ carriers, while antidepressant intake was directly related to GDS≥5 in the L′S′ carriers (OR adj = 2.46, p = .036) and borderline significant in the S′S′ carriers (OR adj = 2.41, p = .081).

Dyslipidaemia was observed in the vitamin D deficient T2DM as compared to the non-deficient T2DM controls although a borderline significant difference was observed in only total cholesterol (p = 0.0812) ( Table 3 ).

Regression analysis In the regression analyses, the association of sex and participant education level remained statistically significant, whilst the association of age was borderline significant (p = 0.082; Table 4 ).

First, we included both affluence and disadvantage in the same model ( Table S12 ) and in this model the pattern of associations between disadvantage/affluence and mortality or LREs was similar to the primary analysis, and the highest quartile of affluence had a borderline significant association with lower risk of incident CVD ( p = 0.082).

In the OS model, NACT showed a non-significant trend towards improved survival (HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.14–1.52; p = 0.202), while FIGO IV showed a borderline significant association with worse OS (HR = 2.81; 95% CI: 0.88–8.99; p = 0.082).

There was no difference in C16:0-Cer content between the groups and no main effect on the change in C16:0-Cer content, but a borderline significant training × group interaction ( p = 0.082) was found.

previously reported “borderline significant” associations of arrhythmic events with left and right atrial radiation dose (p=0.082 and 0.076, respectively), using a broader definition of arrhythmias that included both tachy- and brady-arrhythmias [ 21 ].

This reduction in HbA1c was, however, less at the 18-month time point resulting in borderline significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.082).

The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections showed a borderline significant association ( p = 0.082), with each additional infection increasing the likelihood of mental health disorder by approximately 31% (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 0.97–1.78) ( Table 9 ). 3.7.3.

When testing higher‐order interactions, age × PHQ‐9 and age × eGFR were not significant, while sex × PHQ‐9 showed a modest but significant interaction (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00–1.10, p = 0.033), and sex × eGFR was borderline significant (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–1.00, p = 0.082).

Again, the severe cases showed significantly higher levels of MPO-DNA complexes, calprotectin, and MPO, as compared to both HC and mild cases ( Fig 3D–3F ), wherein MPO-DNA complexes significantly correlated with cluster #3, whereas the association of calprotectin with cluster #4 was borderline significant (p = 0.082).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis established vitamin D as an independent protective factor against malignant thyroid nodules (OR = 0.542, 95% CI: 0.354–0.852, P = 0.008), while IL-17 demonstrated a borderline significant association as a risk factor (OR = 1.415, 95% CI: 0.957–2.094, P = 0.082).