Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.081.6× alphagold
Although significant differences in glucose levels were already present at baseline, complexifying the interpretation of the data, similar results were obtained during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) ( Figure 2I ), with a borderline significant ( P = 0.08) lower glucose drop in the acute response to insulin bolus in CD11c ΔLKB1 compared with CD11c WT mice ( Figure 2J ).
borderline significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Associations between 24h-MBs and QoL among breast cancer survivors At 4 months post-surgery, the 24h-MB composition of breast cancer survivors was significantly associated with overall QoL, the physical well-being domain, and the existential well-being domain ( p < 0.05) and showed a borderline significant association for perceived support ( p = 0.08) (Table 5 ).
borderline significantp=0.081.6× alphagold
Annual increases by age group Annual increases differed by age group as indicated by the borderline significant interaction between study year and age group (p=0.08), and showed smaller increases in the younger age group (age 2–5 year: 2.4%, 95% CI 1.9% to 2.9%) compared with the older age groups (5.1% and 5.7%, respectively, in 6–10 year olds and 11–15 year olds).
borderline significantP = .081.6× alphagold
But when limiting the analysis to sprayers who had only used pyrethroids (52 out of 108 with valid HbA 1c results), a statistically significant trend was revealed between cumulative exposure and odds ratio of abnormal glucose regulation ( P = .01). Sensitivity analyses that only included age, BMI, and use of antidiabetics as confounders gave similar estimates as the fully adjusted models, although the association between cumulative exposure and OR of abnormal glucose regulation among sprayers who had only used pyrethroids was only borderline significant at P = .08 (data not shown).
borderline significantP = 0.0801.6× alphagold
The presence of a tubal ring was borderline significant (OR: 6.500, 95% CI: 0.799 - 52.897, P = 0.080), suggesting that patients with tubal ring findings were approximately six times more likely to experience successful medical management compared to those without.
borderline significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Although we did not observe a significant correlation between serum and dust branched isomer content for PFOS (Spearman correlation coefficient = –0.10, p = 0.35) or PFHxS (Spearman correlation coefficient = –0.11, p = 0.33), we found a borderline significant correlation for PFOA (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.35, p = 0.08).