Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0711.4× alphagold
This could imply a higher level of commitment and awareness among stroke survivors to prioritize their needs and budgeting plans in order to maintain financial resources for their therapy, although financial wellbeing (IFDFW scale) had a borderline significant association with medication adherence ( p = 0.071).
borderline significantp = .0711.4× alphagold
For ego-integrity, there were moderate, borderline significant, effect sizes post-intervention (mean difference = 8.1, 95% CI: -0.71–16.9, ES = .42, t = 1.8, df = 88, p = .071) and at follow-up (mean difference = 9.8, 95% CI: -0.13–19.6, ES = .48, t = 2.0, df = 74, p = .053).
borderline significantP = 0.0711.4× alphagold
Four transporter activity GO terms, including ion channel activity, cation channel activity, substrate-specific channel activity, and cation transmembrane transporter activity, had borderline significant associations with lung cancer (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.071, 0.073, 0.080, and 0.098, respectively) (Table 4 and Fig. 2 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0711.4× alphagold
The three groups of paternal ages < 30, 30-<35 and ≥ 35 years showed borderline significant differences in the OR of implantation failure between the two groups, smoking and never-smoking, in the paternal age group ≥ 35 years (ROR 1.75, p = 0.071), following a non-significant increased ROR at the paternal age of 30-<35 years (1.17, p = 0.277).
borderline significantP = .07161.4× alphagold
The patients who increased TAC PD-L1 expression showed significantly improved survival with ICI treatments over 24 months for PFS (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.5 to 8.3; P = .0091) and borderline significant OS (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.0 to 6.6; P = .0716).
borderline significantP = 0.0721.4× alphagold
In addition, it would be noted that "C-T-A-A-G-A" ( P = 0.073, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.98–1.56) showed a borderline significant association with increased risk of ESRD, on the other hand, haplotype "C-T-G-A-A-G" showed a marginal significant association with decreased risk of ESRD ( P = 0.072, OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.31–1.05).