The ANOVA of the regression with the dependent variable psychological health was also borderline significant ( F [8, 130] = 1.93 p = 0.069).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Tumor location (superior and middle lobe vs inferior lobe) was shown to be a borderline significant factor for the occurrence of OP ( P = 0.069).
In an exploratory subgroup analysis restricted to participants with hyperuricemia, the mediated proportion increased to 39.68 %; however, the total effect in this subgroup was only borderline significant (p = 0.069), limiting interpretability.
Age was borderline significant, with a multivariate HR of 1.031 (95% CI: 0.998–1.066, p = 0.069).
However, a significantly lower concentration of circulating oestradiol was found in those overexpressing SIX1 (P<0.001 when stratifying by SIX1 median levels, within the female group), while testosterone had higher, although only borderline significant, levels (P=0.069).
Additionally, the two latent variables “PL” and “EV” are not strictly independent, showing a borderline significant (p = 0.069) but weak covariance (cov = 0.203, SE = 0.112), which is expected, as they share some measured variables.
By year 2, the difference in Enterobacteriaceae between the high- and low- Bifidobacterium groups was only borderline significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.0693).
We only observed a borderline significant positive interaction between the levels of NO 2 and arthritis ( p = 0.0698).
At regression analysis, SI at the third B value was the only independent predictor of the tear degree (P=0.032), while the SI drop off was borderline significant (P=0.070).
Only the interaction between GI and age for men was borderline significant (p = 0.07).
Borderline significant differences in genotype distribution (Pg = 0.05) and in allelic frequencies ( p = 0.07) were proved between patients treated with interferon α therapy and those who were not.
A one sided Mann and Whitney test that compared the placebo and the 33 μg group showed that differences between the two were borderline significant (p = 0.07), while the two other vaccine groups yielded none significant differences (p > 0.1).
In contrast to group II, the group I participants showed a borderline significant increase in functional capacity/endurance ( p = .07).
This trial showed that the addition of regional nodal irradiation to the supraclavicular lymph nodes, apex of axilla, and internal mammary lymph nodes significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival from 84% to 89.7% ( P = 0.003), and there was also borderline significant improvement of 5-year overall survival from 90.7% to 92.3% ( P = 0.07).
Interactions between noise levels and Pb were borderline significant at 6 kHz thresholds for L max ( p = 0.07) and NN D for maximum occupational exposures ( p = 0.06).
Mean score of the hand maintenance best practices was 77% (SD = 22), and women scored significantly better (p<0.05), while the marital status was borderline significant (p=0.07).
However, ANSB and ANEB were not significantly different between HIV-positive patients with a history of IDU and HIV-negative patients with a history of IDU, while the difference in NSB was borderline significant ( P value = 0.07).
Only income-level of the parents rendered a borderline significant result ( p = 0.07). 57 However, Avilucea et al. went a step further and did a sub-population analysis of the population attending their clubfoot clinic in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. 58 Patients attending the clinic from rural parts of the state (used as a proxy for distance and travel time to the clinic), especially Native American patients, faced similar issues as patients in LMICs.
After pooling CBF results from Tgαq*44 and FVB mice, the difference between absolute CBF in the thalamus (mean flow 134.9 mL/min per 100 g) and cortex (mean flow 103.5 mL/min per 100 g) was borderline significant ( P =0.07; 95% CI −2.88 to 65.73).
Mitochondrial DNA from aged brains (18 months) displayed significantly elevated mutagenesis in the Nd3 (+ 40%) and Nd1 (+ 90%) sites and borderline significant (p = 0.07) increase in the 12S site (+ 50%), whereas the Nd5, Nd6, Cytb and CoxI sites were unaffected.
The comparison of the subgroup of IC patients with CLI patients indicated that the concentration of VEGF-A was borderline significant with P = 0.07 and no differences of sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-2 were noted between these groups of patients.
Results for executive function were borderline significant (β = −0.087; 95% CI = −0.181 to 0.007, p = 0.070).
After adjustment for confounding factors, there was a borderline significant difference for WHR (p = 0.07), although no significant differences were found for BMI.
By contrast, SOX2 remained only borderline significant (raw p = 0.070, FDR p = 0.070) when included and was eventually excluded from the final model.
142 In the latter small, randomized trial, the reduction in the treatment group was only borderline significant compared to the control group ( P = 0.07).