“borderline significant”

The corollary analysis including only USA–based trials returned a borderline significant small effect (SMD −0.24 (95%CI −0.48, −0.01) p = 0.04).

The staging of kidney function at referral was: Stage 1 in 0.7% of participants, Stage 2 in 4.2%, Stage 3 in 37.5%, Stage 4 in 30.8% and Stage 5 in 26.8%; with a borderline significant difference by gender ( p = 0.04).

Serum sodium (Na) also demonstrated a borderline significant inverse association (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.76–1.00, p = 0.040).

Reference to ethics was not significantly different (p=0.16) between study types and REB/IRB/EC reference was borderline significant (p=0.04).

There was a borderline significant increase in the frequency of complaints during the week before a course compared to the previous month in the placebo group (p = 0.04) and in the L . rhamnosus GG group (p = 0.11).

When the analysis looked at creatinine elevations of all grades, a 2% increase in events occurred on PrEP, with a borderline significant increased ( P =0.04) risk on PrEP (97% elevations were grade 1 and 2) being noted.

The results suggest no statistically significant differences after up to 48 months and borderline significant differences in favour of HVGIC sealants after 60 months (RR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09–0.95; p = 0.04 / RD -0.07; 95% CI: -0.14, -0.01).

For participants in the IXT group, there was a moderate and borderline significant correlation between the vergence change due to the −2D lens and the difference in clinical deviation angle at near and distance ( r S = 0.51, p = 0.04), indicating a tendency for those with a greater exo-deviation at near than at distance to exhibit smaller vergence changes.

The difference between Qiagen and Bioneer kits was meaningful for sequence 3 (p = 0.01) and in borderline significant difference for sequence 1 (p = 0.04).

They also include studies that found either borderline significant reduction in CDI (P=0.04, [ 53 ]) or no statistical significance through a reduction in either high-risk drugs or total antimicrobial usage in healthcare settings (respectively, P=0.0597 and P=0.0823, [ 52 ]).

Treatments were also significantly associated with an increased hazard for relapse, though borderline significant ( p = 0.04) ( Table 2 ).

Our results showed that except for a borderline significant association for epigastric tenderness (p=0.04) and burning (p=0.02), none of the remaining demographic characteristics were associated with elevated 28-day prolactin levels (≥20 (ng/mL).

Overall, there was a borderline significant vasoconstrictor effect of hyperoxia on arteries ex vivo (SMD − 0.56 (− 1.09 to − 0.03), P = 0.04, Fig. 4 ).

Modelling associations between evening cortisol level and letter search speed in the sample with complete information on all covariates ( n = 1093) found a similar borderline significant result ( β = −0.063, SE = 0.03, p = .04; Table 4 , Model 1).

Comparison of pre- and post-bronchodilator lung monitor test accuracy revealed a borderline significant difference favouring pre-bronchodilator of 3.9% in sensitivity (7.8%, −0.05%); p = 0.04, but no statistically significant evidence of a difference in specificity (1.9% (−0.9%, 4.7%)); p = 0.10.

In the case where heterozygote rs12252:AG (37/80 or 46% abundance) is expected to behave similarly to homozygote rs12252:AA (19%), so that homozygote rs12252:GG (35%) appears as the risk genotype, then a chi-square statistic would report a non-significant p = 0.36, when q (frequency of rs12252:G) = 0.54 and q 2 = 0.29 according to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, or borderline significant p = 0.04, when q (frequency of rs12252:G) = 0.47, with q 2 = 0.22.

In the multivariate data meta-analysis (fixed effects), there was a borderline significant association between sarcopenia and OS (fixed effects, HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.44, P = 0.04, I 2 = 43%; k = 5; n = 831).

A borderline significant interaction was detected ( p = 0.04), with an increased concentration of mercury measured in the feces of mice exposed to MeHg HD and SeMet concomitantly ( Figure 2 ). 2.3.

The herd-dependent association between PWD and hyperleukocytosis was borderline significant (P = 0.04).

A borderline significant association between STIM1 polymorphism rs1561876 and BASFI ( P -value = 0.04) or BAS-G ( P -value = 0.06) was found.

Correlation coefficients however were very weak, with borderline significant differences by diabetes status for the correlations of CIMT with TEAC ( P = 0.04), Ox-LDL ( P = 0.02), and TBARS ( P = 0.04).

The percentages of DCs in tumor did not seem to vary in NSCLC patients with different disease stages, except possibly for CD141 + DCs which were more frequent in stage I compared to stage II NSCLC, although the p -value was borderline significant ( p = 0.04) and will need to be confirmed with a larger patient cohort ( Supplementary Figure 12 ).

Three-way ANOVA analyses disclosed a borderline significant effect of TPT1 silencing on γH2A.X foci (p = 0.04), though not on 53BP1 foci ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Participants with both low MRFS and high PRS had the lowest mortality (HR 0.544, 95%CI 0.432–0.686), with a borderline significant multiplicative interaction ( P = 0.040).

There were also borderline significant differences between the groups in the approved chemotherapy schedule (p = 0.04) and the timing of planned neck dissection (p = 0.03).