Future outlook differences became borderline significant using median split and extreme groups methods ( p = 0.06 and 0.07, respectively), while physical activity differences became non-significant using the extreme groups method ( p = 0.157).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Decomposition of this effect using univariate analyses of variance showed there was a borderline significant difference in age, F (1, 158) = 3.69; p = .06, between the two groups.
Nationally, the strength of cold spell–mortality associations declined from 1972 to 2015 for all causes and most of the more specific outcomes, with significant negative trends ( p < 0.05 ) for cerebrovascular disease and cerebral infarction, and a borderline significant decrease ( p = 0.06 ) in mortality due to age-related physical debility.
There was a borderline significant negative correlation between the left axis angle and the left CoANSMe angle ( r = -0.27, p = 0.06).
By contrast, the annual incidence of schizophrenia was substantially lower in the SVR compared with the non-SVR groups with a borderline significant (0.6 vs 2.6 per 10 000 person-years, P = .060).
The interaction of smoking with exposure was statistically significant for glycol ethers ( p = 0.02) and xylene ( p = 0.03) and was borderline significant for aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons ( p = 0.06) and ethylene/propylene glycols ( p = 0.06).
The type of treatment protocol had a borderline significant relationship (p = 0.06) with local treatment outcome.
For each of the four outcomes considered (progression to CD4<200, AIDS 1987, AIDS 1992, and death), the antiviral contribution of an allele was negatively correlated with its HR, and this inverse correlation was borderline significant for the outcomes AIDS 1987 ( p = 0.06), AIDS 1993 ( p = 0.07), and death ( p = 0.045).
The association between third-trimester CO concentrations and birth weight (−7.1 g per IQR) was borderline significant ( p = 0.06).
Additionally, there were borderline significant improvements in 5‐year PCSS (83.5% vs. 72.0%; p = 0.06) and OS (71.3% vs. 64.0%; p = 0.1) in patients receiving the SIB technique (Fig. 2 b, d).
Univariate Cox Regression Analysis In the univariate Cox regression analysis (the summary is presented in Table 3 ), the older age at onset had a higher hazard of mortality, but the result was borderline significant (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.99–1.07, p = 0.06).
Re‐running the analysis for the composite recall score while controlling for composite recall 2 years earlier (W5) revealed the same significant interaction ( B = −7.39, SE = 2.68, β = −0.09, t = 2.75, p = 0.005), yet the relevant main effect for those feeling older was borderline significant ( B = 0.89, SE = 0.48, t = 1.85, p = 0.06).
Although this was only borderline significant ( P = 0.06) in this small patient group, the feasibility of sorafenib drug monitoring to achieve a target exposure supports this strategy to improve controlled drug exposure.
However, Egger’s regression tests were borderline significant for results regarding both the amplitude ( p = 0.06) and latency of the N100 component ( p = 0.10) (Section 5 in S1 Appendix ).
For intake of SSB during weekend days the results were borderline significant (p = 0.06).
There was a trend towards improvement on the PASAT-3 with borderline significant results (SMD=0.32; 95% CI -0.01-0.64; I 2 65%; p=0.06) ( Figure 3 ) ( 47 , 50 , 55 ).
There was a borderline significant effect of treatment group on reaction time [ F (1,23) = 3.931, p = 0.06] reflecting that the diazepam group was faster to react than the placebo group (see Table 2 ).
Finally, a borderline significant ( P = 0.06) 0.9% absolute reduction in the primary cardiovascular outcome measure was found with exenatide in the EXCEL study 174 .
Compared to IVIG, GTX showed a reduction in all-cause mortality, which was borderline significant (p=0.06).
There was also a borderline significant relationship in the expected direction for DBP ( P = 0.06).
Subgroup univariable regression analysis based on sex revealed that elevated serum homocysteine levels are a significant predictor of CMED in males (OR, 1.50 [1.02–2.20]; P =0.04) and borderline significant in females (OR, 1.36 [0.98–1.89]; P =0.06; P interaction =0.71).
Isolation by distance tests showed a significant correlation between ATP8 nucleotide distances and distance by sea (r = 0.282, n = 16, P = 0.030), and borderline significant correlations between ATP8 amino acid distances (r = 0.271, n = 16, P = 0.060) and ATP6 nucleotide distances (r = 0.210, n = 16, P = 0.064) with distance by sea.
DBP Haplotype 1 and Dietary Calcium Intake in Osteoporosis In the subgroup ( n = 4,747) with a record of dietary calcium intake, we observed a similar trend (compared to the entire study population) and a borderline significant association of DBP haplotype 1 and fracture risk ( P = 0.06).
104 mg/L, P < 0.001), translating into borderline significant superior survival ( P = 0.060 for rs1520220) and reduced treatment-related mortality ( P = 0.050 for rs978458).
Of note, we report a borderline significant negative correlation between baseline coenzyme Q10 levels and baseline irisin (R = –0.22, P = 0.06).