“borderline significant”

Having a metachronous primary lung cancer was borderline significant for a higher LPFS (p = 0.06).

There was a borderline significant increase in G3/4 diarrhoea (OR: 1.75, p = 0.06), but no effect on treatment discontinuation without progression (OR: 0.87, p = 0.25).

Similarly, in the subgroup of patients with moderate atopic dermatitis defined as baseline IGA = 3, the Nu0.5 group showed a borderline significant decrease in IGA score from baseline (-16.7%, 95% CI: -31.3% to -2.0%, p = 0.06) ( Figure 2F ).

After accounting for maternal race/ethnicity, education, maternal age at delivery, newborn’s gender and gestational age at birth, these associations were borderline significant (β = 1.57, SE = 0.82, P = 0.06).

In parathyroid tissue there were no difference between PH and SH for p53, Ki-67, caspase, EGFR expressions; while there were significantly difference for TGFα ( P = 0.047) and borderline significant difference for p21 ( P = 0.06) expressions.

In the univariate Cox regression analysis ( Table 2 ), a borderline significant association was observed between low UAR (<1) and improved PFS (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.24–1.05, p = 0.06).

PC ae C44:4 had a borderline significant interaction ( p = 0.06). 3.2.

In the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR tests, all of the observed significant interactions were substantially reduced and we found borderline significant interactions for VDR rs1544410 ( Bsm1 , p = 0.06), rs731236 ( Taq1 , p = 0.06), rs7975232 ( Apa1 , p = 0.06) and AGT rs699 (p = 0.06).

Correlation Analysis of HR Expression A borderline significant correlation was observed between age at diagnosis and HR expression ( p = 0.06).

The AgCC group revealed a borderline significant correlation between ToM and the SDQ Peer Problems subscale [ r (17) = −0.45, p = 0.06], and the Prosocial subscale marginally correlated with ToM [ r (17) = 0.46, p = 0.06], complex mental state recognition [ r (18) = 0.42, p = 0.08], and inhibitory control [ r (15) = 0.48, p = 0.06].

For the measure of exercise, a borderline significant change-change correlation with WM was observed (r main = 0.21, p = 0.06; r supp = 0.19, p = 0.05).

All PBP3 groups and subgroups with sufficient data ( n > 5) were significantly associated with ampicillin resistance ( p < 0.05), except group IIa, which was borderline significant ( p = 0.06) (Table 1 ).

For the SN, there was a stronger interaction ( b = −0.03, SE = 0.01, t [89.6] = −3.47, p < 0.001) due to a borderline significant increase in contrast with age in HC ( b = 0.04, SE = 0.02, t [26] = 1.93, p = 0.06) and a significant decrease in AD ( b = −0.03, SE = 0.01, t [69.9] = −3.17, p = 0.002).

In addition there was a borderline significant adverse effect for deletion 14q in patients with gain 1q regarding EFS (median of 13 vs . 15 months, P =0.06, Figure 2C ).

Borderline significant associations were seen between PNP and decreasing gestational age (β = −0.37 weeks, p = 0.06) and ponderal index (β = −0.08 g/cm 3 , p = 0.06), but only in the group below the median.

3 A), but brood size at fledging was independent of either male or female nest visit rate when analyzed separately ( P > 0.05; although male nest visit rate was borderline significant, P = 0.06, Fig. 3 B).

Vegetable category and pH were borderline significant ( p = 0.06, PERMANOVA).

There was also a borderline significant difference observed between class 2 and class 3 BRAF -mutant colorectal cancers (frequencies 16.1% and 35.8%, respectively; P = 0.06, Fisher exact test; Table 1 ).

There was a borderline significant inverse dose response between cumulative radiation dose and chromosome-type aberrations among workers (τ = −0.13, p = 0.06).

Still, the interaction occupational status×period×time was only borderline significant, p=0.06 ( table 2 ).

IIB) (HR = 3.93, p = 0.02), and a tumor diameter >8 cm (HR = 2.38, p = 0.04) were found to correlate with worse overall survival post-surgery in the univariate analysis, with PTA still significant ( p < 0.05) and Enneking staging borderline significant ( p = 0.06) in the multivariate model. 3.2.

A borderline significant association ( p = 0.060) was found between education levels and cleaning frequency.

By contrast, the minor allele (T) of rs11203367 conferred a borderline significant increase in OR for anti-CCP-positive RA in HLA-DRB1*04 -positive subjects (p=0.06, Table 3 ), as visualized in Figure 2B (light blue bars for carriers versus dark blue bars for non-carriers).

Nevertheless, after adjustment for age, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, substance use disorder, lifetime history of suicide attempts and diagnostic type, these dose-effect relationships were only found for daily functioning impairment (p = 0.005), restraint (p = 0.04) and shape concern (borderline significant p = 0.06) (data not shown, available on request) ( Fig. 1 ).

Lower levels of self-efficacy had a borderline significant relationship with decline in dietary quality (β=0.51, 95% CI −0.003 to 0.1069, p=0.06).