“borderline significant”

When compared with the sedation group, patients under GA had a relative risk of 0.62 to have gastrointestinal perforation, and this difference was borderline significant (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.21–1.82; I 2 = 52%; P = 0.06) ( Figure 4A ).

The correlation was positive, but weak and borderline significant, in never smokers (Spearman r = 0.07, p = 0.06).

The changes in BMD in the subgroups (according to disease duration) were all significant except for the DXA-BMD hand patients with disease duration longer than 3 years ( P = 0.26) and the DXA-BMD spine ( P = 0.60) and DXA-BMD total hip patients with disease duration less than 3 years (borderline significant, P = 0.06).

The pooled analysis revealed a borderline significant 30% increased recurrence risk for ITCs versus node-negative disease (HR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0–1.6; p = 0.06), with remarkable consistency between St Clair et al.

The P of interaction for the treatment arm was borderline significant ( P = 0.06).

To assess relationships between platelet counts and onset of mucosal bleeding in more detail in this group, we compared the most recent counts measured prior to development of any mucosal bleeding (≤24 hours) with counts measured at the same time in the disease evolution for patients who never developed mucosal bleeding ( Figure 4 ); the counts were significantly lower in those who developed mucosal bleeding on days 5 and 6 of illness (p = 0.03 and p<0.001, respectively) and borderline significant for day 4 (p = 0.06, all Mann-Whitney test).

Chemotherapy was borderline significant ( p = 0.06).

Exposure to family planning messages via radio was associated with higher odds of breast (OR: 2.35; p < 0.001) and oral cancer screening (OR: 2.47; p < 0.001), while the association with cervical cancer screening was borderline significant (OR: 1.26; p = 0.06).

There was borderline significant association with incident TB (AHR 2.2; 95%CI: 0.94 - 5.09, p = 0.06).

A borderline significant difference between groups was observed in nocturnal values of SBP ( p = 0.06) and DBP ( p = 0.04) ( Table 4 ).

The association between third-trimester CO concentrations and birth weight (−7.1 g per IQR) was borderline significant ( p = 0.06).

[ 27 ] found a borderline significant positive association (P= 0.06) between job demands and increased BMI.

Following booster vaccination, we found a borderline significant (p=0.06) increase in anti-spike granzyme B responses, in particular anti-S1, in infection-naïve participants (S1 – M3 versus M6) ( Figure 3A ).

For the Cox proportional hazard regression model for time to complication (Table 3 ) as per prior analyses [ 1 ], we found that EVD device type remained as a significant predictor in either univariate ( p < 0.008) or multivariate ( p < 0.010) Cox model analyses while pre-operative MRS was initially significant in the univariate analysis ( p < 0.014) but became borderline significant in the multivariate analysis ( p < 0.060).

In work by Yahalom and Israeli-Korn et al., difference in left–right asymmetry was borderline significant ( p = 0.06) in age-matched DIP and PD cohorts [ 20 ].

When all data are included, no significant correlation is present ( r = 0.40, P = 0.10), but this correlation becomes borderline significant ( r = 0.47, P = 0.06) upon exclusion of the two outlying data points of the subjects with the two highest values for whole body glucose uptake.

The log-rank test showed a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.06).

Somatic mutation(s) was a borderline significant independent factor for inferior PFS (adjusted HR=2.03; 95%CI: 0.97-4.26; P =0.06) ( Online Supplementary Figure S6 ).

Vegetable category and pH were borderline significant ( p = 0.06, PERMANOVA).

The study showed a borderline significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) in the combination arm compared with ADT alone (HR =0.75, 95% CI, 0.55-1.01; P=0.06).

However, upon further control for CRP and IL-6 ( Appendix Table 4 ), the relationship between ferritin and incident diabetes became significant in African American men and NHW American women and borderline significant in African American women (p = 0.06).

The association between higher GSTP1 percent methylation and decreased FEV1 was borderline significant in the sample as a whole ( β = − 0.37, SE = 0.20, p = 0.06) and in boys in stratified analyses ( β = − 0.56, SE = 0.29, p = 0.05).

STAT5A did not demonstrate any significant interaction or main effects although the effect of fat depot was borderline significant ( P = 0.06) with specific differences undetectable by post hoc testing.

The difference between age groups was significant for all strains (p<0.01), but in post-hoc analysis the difference in ε T between the middle and oldest age groups was only borderline significant (p=0.06).

In our previous report, elevated CEA level was a borderline significant factor in skip N2 metastases in stage IA NSCLCs ( p = 0.06) [ 24 ].