“borderline significant”

Consistent with these observations, HPV-positive OPSCC showed non-aggressive tumour invasive front (p=0.001), little desmoplastic stromal reaction (p=0.059, borderline significant), and rich inflammatory host reaction (p=0.013) than HPV-negative OPSCC.

Wound infection was borderline significant in Model 1 (OR 7.56, p = 0.059).

Alpelisib incubation resulted in reduced Pparg expression compared to control medium in lipoma tissue (borderline significant, p = 0.059), while its effect on Pparg expression was less pronounced in control WAT.

At the TNFRSF19 locus, rs9510787 showed a borderline significant association with NPC (OR = 1.13, P = 5.92 × 10 −2 ) consistent with previous findings [ 13 ].

The overall well-being index was borderline significant for lower odds of preterm birth (OR=0.934, 95% CI: 0.887–1.002, p=0.0593), reaching significance when adjusted for maternal age (OR=0.938 95% CI: 0.883-0.998, p=0.0414).

After additional adjustments for diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (Model 5), as well as chronic kidney disease (Model 6), the associations were slightly attenuated but remained significant for the PU-persistent group (aHR: 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13–1.42; p = 0.0008), became borderline significant for the PU-developed group (aHR: 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00–1.16; p = 0.0595), and were not significant for the PU-recovered group (aHR: 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98–1.14; p = 0.1543) (p for trend < 0.0001) (Model 6 of Table 2 ).

The Long cohort was the smallest of the three validation cohorts, which may potentially explain at least in part, why our progression model was only borderline significant ( P = 0.0596) in multivariate analysis in this cohort.

Median PFAS serum levels did not differ significantly between those who did and did not take the survey for PFNA (p=0.1526), PFOA (p=0.4913), and PFHxS (p=0.6973), but for PFOS the median serum levels were lower among those who took the health survey and this difference was borderline significant (7.25 μg/L sd 4.50, and 8.37 μg/L sd 5.57, respectively p=0.0597).

Seasonal trends revealed a borderline significant effect on Legionella pneumophila monthly proportions ( p = 0.0598), with the highest values observed in summer (10.72 per 1000 tested patients) ( Figure 2 a).

Results: At the end of the winter season we found that CYP2R1 (rs10741657) and GC (rs4588 and rs842999) were statistically associated with serum 25(OH)D concentrations and CYP2R1 (rs10766197) was borderline significant ( p = 0.0599) for the fortification group.

3.2 Habituation Linear mixed model results revealed a nonsignificant main effect of tDCS group ( F 1,25.06 = 0.76 p = .39), a borderline significant main effect of stimulus type ( F 2,130.17 = 2.94, p = .06), and a nonsignificant Stimulus Type × tDCS Group interaction ( F 2,130.17 = 1.15, p = .32).

Findings from the UPenn cohort supported the prognostic value of CSF AcTau174 in FTLD-TDP; higher baseline AcTau174 was associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline as measured by MMSE, although this association was borderline significant ( β = −1.63; 95% CI = −3.25, −0.05, P = 0.06; Fig. 3c and Extended Data Table 3 ).

A significant difference was seen for indigestion (difference in medians 0.1, P =0.03) during the high-risk period, and a borderline significant effect was seen for abdominal pain (difference in medians 0.48, P =0.06).

Specifically, the expression of HIF-1α showed a borderline significant decrease ( P =0.06), CEBP expression demonstrated a significant reduction ( P =0.007), and PPARγ expression did not exhibit a significant change ( P =0.5530).

Stratification by type of cancer showed a borderline significant reduced risk of colorectal cancer ( p = 0.06) but no effect on only colon cancer ( p = 0.18).

girls, 38.6%; p = 0.71), but the finding regarding sex differences in participation in family meals was only borderline significant (13–18 years: boys, 69.6% vs. girls, 77.0%; p = 0.06).

The difference in the overall categories of treatment between the groups was borderline significant ( P = .06 by chi-square).

There was a borderline significant increase in total exercise duration from 10.47 ± 3.68 min to 11.60 ± 3.25 min (p = 0.06).

Between 2012 and 2019, a significant increase in the prevalence of eczema symptoms was observed (from 3.6% to 7.0%; p < 0.001), while asthma showed a borderline significant increase (p = 0.06) and rhinitis remained stable [ 79 ].

A borderline significant association between AHW-IgE and AHW-HR was observed pretreatment ( P = .06), which strengthened and became significant post-treatment ( P = .01); however, this change in strength of association was not significant.

The repeated measures of ANOVA revealed the saxagliptin plus vitamin D group was significantly different compared with the conventional therapy group ( P = 0.001), and the full least-squares models indicated a significant difference of mean change of 2-h C-peptide AUC between the saxagliptin plus vitamin D group and the conventional therapy group at 12 months, 18 months and 24 months ( P = 0.023, 0.038 and 0.013, respectively), and a borderline significant difference at 6 months ( P = 0.06).

After adjusting for the use of combined DMARDs, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, the patients with RA treated with leflunomide still showed a borderline significant association with anxiety ( β = 0.134, p = 0.06).

The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the long-rank test demonstrated a higher survival in females than in males, even if borderline significant ( p = 0.06) (Fig. 1 ); the survival rates at 5 year were 85.6% of males and 92.4% of females, respectively.

When disabling foot pain, assessed with the MFPDI, was used as the objective variable, the association between being overweight and the presence of pain was borderline significant ( p = 0.06, Table 5 ).

Results Line 196-197: Authors state: “except for inter-limb asymmetry during the re-test, which was borderline significant (Table 1).” What is borderline significant (p=0.06 or p=0.1 or p=0.2???).