Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Interestingly, a borderline significant association (P = 0.058) was observed between age and saliva volume, suggesting that older subjects may have been more likely to provide a 0.5 mL sample, consistent with reports that xerostomia (dry mouth) prevalence increases with age [ 8 ].
borderline significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
For low performers , the main effect for TMS site was borderline significant [ F (1,7) = 5.107; p = 0.058; η p 2 = 0.422], with the main effect of congruency [ F (3,21) = 1.264; p = 0.312; η p 2 = 0.153] and interaction between site and congruency being non-significant [ F (3,21) = 2.293; p = 0.11; η p 2 = 0.247].
borderline significantp =0.0581.2× alphagold
When patients were stratified by either gender or smoking status, those with high TWIST1 had significantly elevated risk of death compared to those with low TWIST1 in male (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.12 – 2.25) (p = 0.010) and borderline significant elevated risk in smoker (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.99 – 1.94) (p =0.058) subgroups (Table 4 ) after adjusting covariates.
borderline significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Subglandular placement with smooth implants (37.0 percent) versus subglandular placement with textured implants (20.2 percent) was borderline significant ( p = 0.058), and axillary incision with smooth implants (34.6 percent) versus axillary incision with textured implants (14.8 percent) trended toward significance ( p = 0.077).
borderline significantp=0.0581.2× alphagold
A borderline significant association was also found between short term exposure of PM10 and ischemic-stroke among females OR 2.09 (0.975 to 4.512), p=0.058.
Abstracts
Ann Indian Acad Neurol · 2017 · PMC5822470