Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
In this sample, there was a significant difference in comorbidity count between frail and non-frail individuals ( p < 0.001 for both frailty metrics), while a borderline significant difference was observed for age ( p = 0.057 for both indexes) and no difference for BMI ( p = 0.17 for mFI-11 and p = 0.61 for mFI-5).
borderline significantP =0.0571.1× alphagold
Interestingly, meta-regression analyses revealed a borderline significant correlation between the reported effect sizes and the proportion of postmenopausal women in individual studies (slope=-0.543, P =0.057; Figure 5C ), suggesting a trend between a stronger beneficial effect with an increasing number of postmenopausal women enrolled in the original trials.
borderline significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
In the model including both seasons, a larger wetland area was positively associated with boscalid detection (regression coefficient = 0.731, p < 0.001), while distance to wetlands showed a borderline significant negative association (regression coefficient = −0.339, p = 0.057); no other variables remained statistically significant.
borderline significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
There was a significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 6.742, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.092) for MS 3 duration, a significant cue × group interaction effect ( F (2, 133) = 5.246, p = 0.006, η p 2 = 0.073) and a significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 9.746, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.128) for MS 3 coverage; and there was a significant cue × group interaction effect ( F (2, 133) = 3.369, p = 0.037, η p 2 = 0.048) and a borderline significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 2.935, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.042) for MS 4 coverage, and a significant cue × group interaction effect ( F (2, 133) = 5.669, p = 0.004, η p 2 = 0.079) and a significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 6.640, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.091) for MS 4 occurren