A borderline significant interaction between H. pylori cagA status and genotypes at rs2294008 was observed for the combined group of subjects with IM or dysplasia (p = P = 0.056), in which the association appeared stronger in the cagA -positive group (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.29–2.42) than the cagA -negative group (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.63–1.68).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A higher proportion of grade IV gliomas were non-midline tumors (82%) versus midline tumors (66%), but the difference was borderline significant ( P = 0.056; Table 1 ).
Interaction testing revealed a borderline significant interaction between age and TBFP ( p = 0.056).
After adjustment for socio-demographic measures and number of FQHCs, every 5/100,000 increase in the PCP supply in 2011 was borderline significant (OR = 1.026, 95% CI = 0.999-1.054, P = .056) associated with the odds of being in the most favorable or the middle trajectory category group, and every 1/100,000 increase in the PCP supply change from 2011 to 2019 was significantly associated with 1.0% increase in odds of being in the most favorable trajectory category group (OR = 1.010, 95% CI = 1.001-1.019, P = .023).
None of these associations were evident in either the black men or women, with the exception of a borderline significant ( r = 0.20; p = 0.056) relationship between TPR and CK activity in the black men, in partial regression analyses.
In all three cases, there was an increase in protein expression in the adult PCP treated rats compared with the control group, despite the effect on TROY protein expression only being a minor increase of 7% ( P =0.011; Figure 2 ), and the effect on Myt1 protein expression only equating to a borderline significant increase of 14.5% ( P =0.056; Figure 2 ).
Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly poorer survival ( p < 0.001) in dogs with a high Ki67 PI (≥ 18%), whereas the composite score showed a borderline significant association with outcome in Cox regression ( p = 0.056; hazard ratio 2.80).
Sensitivity analysis with 5 knots identified a threshold at 216.0 mg/day and a borderline significant nonlinearity ( P = .056), but the curve showed more fluctuation.
High S100A monocyte gene expression was associated with elevated plasma levels of protein S100A8, while the elevation of protein S100A9 was borderline significant ( p = 0.056) ( Figure 6 ).
The linear model, however, indicates that these participants slept 9 fewer (95%CI(−19, 0)) minutes; the confidence interval is more informative than the borderline significant p-value=0.056.
The effect modification of water source on the association was only borderline significant ( p = 0.056).
The difference was only borderline significant when salt intake was expressed as g per 10 MJ (difference −1.1 g/10 MJ, 95% CI: −2.2 to 0.0 g/10 MJ, p = 0.056).
However, we observed a borderline significant difference when comparing ICI monotherapy with dual/combination strategies (p-value = 0.056) in favor of the latest.
Similarly, the improvement in lower body peak velocity (group effect) seen in the KF group was borderline significant when compared to the decline in the TC group (KF: +5.9 ± 13.5 cm·s −1 ; TC: −12.1 ± 24.7 cm·s −1 ; P = .056).
A borderline significant difference was found for HKA between OA types ( P = 0.056).
Results We find a borderline significant association between the mitochondrial variant rs28357980, localized to MT-ND2, and BMI (β = − 0.69, p = 0.056).
Meta‐regression analyses In the meta‐regression analysis, the target sample had a significant effect on YFAS‐C score ( p = 0.002) and borderline significant effect on prevalence ( p = 0.056) (Table 4 ).
MR-Egger regression yielded a borderline significant positive effect (OR: 1.231, 95% CI: 0.995–1.523, p = 0.056), whereas the weighted median estimator demonstrated stronger evidence for causality (OR: 1.157, 95% CI: 1.077–1.241, p = 5.72 × 10 −5 ) ( Figure 5(a) ).
The interaction effect for IUTSE and ASI on frailty index was borderline significant ( P = 0.056).
A borderline significant positive association was found (P = 0.056).
Joint associations of RC and hs-CRP with risk of coronary heart disease When using the cut-points of 1.00 mmol/L for RC and 2.00 mg/L for hs-CRP to define elevated RC and hs-CRP, their interactions were borderline significant for CHD ( P = 0.056) and significant for MI ( P = 0.007).
44 At 11 months, 3 PCV doses showed a borderline significant reduction in VT carriage compared with 2 PCV doses (10.0% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.056).
The difference in improvement between interventions was borderline significant (p = 0.056), indicating that behavioral feedback could be superior to educational training alone for improving knowledge and attitude scores.
Although there is no significant difference in neurological deficits between MK-801 and control-treated animals, a Kruskal-Wallis test indicates a borderline significant improvement after MK-801 treatment on day 2 (P = 0.056) (Figure 2D ).
Associations with inflammation detected by US across all time points The univariate analyses showed significant associations between GLOESS and patient-reported flare ( p = 0.01), SJC28 ( p = 0.01), and CRP (borderline significant p = 0.056), while independent associations were only observed for SJC28 ( p = 0.009) (Table 4 ).