“borderline significant”

There was a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.025) in the sensitivities of the 3D7 and Dd2 strains to 8-azaguanine but not to the other purine nucleobases ( Table 1 ) and we conclude that purine derivates are not cross-resistant with chloroquine.

As predicted, pairwise comparisons revealed the mean difference in intended consumption was significantly larger between portion sizes in the pair that crossed the lower norm boundary than between portion size pairs that fell inside of the norm range, Study 1: MD difference in intended consumption between paired portion sizes = 0.20, SE = 0.05, p < .001, but this comparison was only borderline significant (against Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.025) in Study 2, MD = 0.31, SE = 0.13, p = .025.

The exceptions are the measures of the fourth internode, and overall stem length that are borderline significant ( p = 0.0254 , and p = 0.0068 , accordingly).

The association became borderline nonsignificant after adjustment for age and gender at baseline (0.98 [0.94, 1.01], p value = .153) and borderline significant after adjustment for age and gender at follow-up (0.97 [0.94, 0.99], p value = .026).

The differences in LLT between the groups were borderline significant at 5 minutes ( P = 0.026) and significant at 15 minutes ( P = 0.0095) ( Figure B).

A significant improvement in C5 values with SB-705498 treatment was reported at 2 h ( p = 0.005) and borderline significant at 24 h ( p = 0.026) when compared to placebo treatment.

Moreover, the PV CSA and PM CSA displayed weak, borderline significant, positive correlations with the LAD pCAT (ρ = 0.150 p = 0.026 and ρ = 0.140 p = 0.039, respectively), and CX pCAT (ρ = 0.147 p = 0.029 and ρ = 0.144 p = 0.032, respectively).

Similar results were obtained for the individual qMSP assays by univariate cox regression analysis but was only borderline significant for assay 2 (assay 1, p = 0.026, HR = 1.57 (1.06–2.34), C-index = 0.564; assay 2, p = 0.051, HR = 1.49 (1.00-2.22), C-index = 0.546; Additional files 10 and 11 ).

For nucleus accumbens there was a significant group × time × sex interaction ( p = 0.011) and post hoc tests of the patients group revealed a borderline significant month × sex interaction ( p = 0.026) due to a trend for lower rCBF in female patients at baseline.

The difference for oligodendrocytes was borderline significant when corrected ( t (8) = 2.73 P c = 0.052, p = 0.026; g = 1.59, 95% CI 0.14–3.03; Fig. 3 F).

Sensitivity analyses restricted to early-phase MPS measurements resulted in a pooled SMD of−0.354 (95% CI: −0.632 to −0.076; p = 0.013), whereas inclusion of late (± middle) phase measurements attenuated the pooled effect (SMD range: −0.265 to −0.227) but remained statistically significant or borderline significant (p = 0.026–0.050).

A borderline significant correlation was observed between HMGA2 nuclear staining and lymph node metastasis ( P =0.027).

Potential mediation was further supported by the finding that the overall interaction effect was only borderline significant after addition of these risk factors (model 6 versus model 5, P = 0.062 ( Table 3 )), although the interaction effect of the WGS with low versus high EA was not attenuated and remained nominally significant (model 6, B = −0.034 (SE, 0.015); P = 0.027) (Web Table 1).

BAY 1895344 treatment resulted in some growth inhibition and borderline significant prolonged time to tumor doubling (EFS-2: 7 days control vs. 18 days BAY 1895344; P = 0.027).

HAs was borderline significant ( p = 0.027).

The mean and upper limit of end-diastolic RV volume were higher in TM patients than controls for males, but this was borderline significant for females (p = 0.027 for males, p = 0.093 for females).

Furthermore, there was a very small, borderline significant within-subject effect (β = −.06, p = .027): Upward changes in “positive feelings toward God” were associated with small, downward changes in depressive symptoms.

Main issue from the previous round of review: There is indeed a positive correlation between Braak stage severity and BG4 staining, but this correlation is relatively weak and borderline significant (R = 0.52, p value = 0.028).

Similarly, the Medtronic NIM 3.0 system showed a borderline significant reduction in RLNI risk (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32–0.94, p = 0.028).

cfDNA levels were only significantly correlated with INR at the prehospital time point (with a borderline significant p- value of 0.048), and with PTT ratio at the in-hospital time point ( p = 0.028).

There was a borderline significant difference in SE among the different grades of FT in the macular area ( P = 0.029), but no significant difference in other areas.

The same variables were significantly higher than in controls also selecting only PD patients with BBS values comparable to controls ( N = 11 patients with BBS > 51) (borderline significant p = 0.029 for ML SD of trunk sway with OE, p = 0.012 for total SD of trunk sway with OE, and p = 0.019 for total SD of trunk sway with OEC).

After adjustment for confounders, the association remained significant for patients in the third tHcy quartile and was borderline significant for patients in the fourth quartile compared with patients in the first quartile (adjusted HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.06–4.86; P =0.029 and adjusted HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.01–4.63; P =0.049, respectively; Table 3 ).

However, there is a borderline significant decreasing trend ( P = .029) of mortality with preinoculation dose in this data set, with EOR/Gy = −0.62 (95% CI, −0.90 to −0.09; Table 2 , Table E7 ) again confirmed by Figure 1 .

Heterogeneity among the studies was borderline significant ( I 2 = 52%, P = 0.03).