“borderline significance”

36 Statistical significance for this study was established as p < 0.05; borderline significance was defined as p < 0.06.

Age had a positive correlation with BMP-2 expression with borderline significance (r = .27, P = .06) while gender, spinal level and BMI did not have any impact on calcification expression.

Although this difference in prevalence of SA risk was not significantly different (borderline significance at P =0.06), it may be a clinically meaningful difference.

Meta-regression of antidepressant effects in the main analysis Baseline depressive symptoms had borderline significance as moderators of the antidepressant effects of exercise (B = 0.156, 95%CI 0.008-0.3223, p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.09).

Post-RT versus pre-RT ratio of SUV max was associated with OS with borderline significance (HR = 3.89, 95% CI, 0.94–16.02, p = 0.060).

Multivariate regression without entering data of frontal sub-regions showed that education predicted MMSE (=0.49, p<0.001) and volume of cGM had borderline significance (=0.21, p=0.06) in affecting MMSE.

Serum vitamin D deficiency had a tendency to increase the risk of early AMD, although with borderline significance [odds ratio (OR) = 3.59; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.95–13.58; P = .060].

0.15 [0.11, 0.19] g/week/kg, respectively; Table 3 ), albeit with borderline significance ( p =0.06, Table 3 ).

This difference had a borderline significance (p=0.06).

A moderation effect of processes of change on PA behavior was suggested with borderline significance (Qb = 3.51, p = 0.06), meaning that studies using processes of change were twice as likely to increase PA ( d = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.24–0.67) compared with those that did not ( d = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.07–0.34). 3.5.7 Number of TTM theoretical constructs Eighteen studies of 33 (55%) used at least 3 of the 5 TTM constructs (e.g., SOC, decisional balance, temptation, self-efficacy, POC) to tailor their intervention.

Although this trend shows only borderline significance ( p = 0.06), this finding suggests a potential involvement of CAG repeat expansion in breast cancer susceptibility.

Younger age (<50) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival, and Ki67 positive status showed borderline significance (p = 0.06) with inferior disease-specific survival.

34.6 [9/26]; P = 0.01) and slightly higher accuracy, showing borderline significance, compared with CR based on PET/CT and endoscopy (75.0% [39/52] vs. 55.8 [29/52]; P = 0.06).

However, the effects of G4 sequences at promoters only had borderline significance ( p = 0.06, Fig. 4 A), similarly to that observed for PEO1 and PEO4 cells.

Media use had borderline significance with higher skinfold thicknesses (β = 0.85, 95% CI [-0.04, 1.75], P=0.06; n = 1334) Conclusion Watching > 2 hours/day of TV/videos in US preschool-age children was associated with a higher risk of being overweight or at risk for overweight and higher adiposity–findings in support of national guidelines to limit preschool children's media use.

The variables selected for the multiple regression model by this process explained 63% of the variation in SF12 physical component scores, though the statistical significance of individual variables was limited to morning stiffness ( p = 0.05) and sleep disturbance ( p = 0.03), with fatigue having borderline significance ( p = 0.06).

This association persisted with borderline significance amongst individuals with a high PCWP, odds ratio (95% CI) 2.72 (0.96–7.68, p = 0.06), but not in those with a low PCWP.

However, SFTPA , CEACAM5 and DSG3 exhibited similar trends, with borderline significance (P = 0.06, P = 0.07, and P = 0.09, respectively).

Stage 1 Significant associations ( P < 0.05) with the DIVA-5-ID were found for questions 1, 2, 3 and 6, and borderline significance ( P = 0.06) for question 8 ( Table 3 ).

33.3% in HCC), with borderline significance ( p = 0.0601), suggesting its complementary role in panels rather than as a standalone discriminator [ 59 , 60 , 61 ].

The concurrent reduction in metastasis achieved borderline significance (p < 0.0604, Fig. 7A,C ).

By the 12-month follow-up, the between-group difference had diminished to borderline significance (55.68±17.53 vs 65.81±11.49, p=0.061).

Furthermore, one mutation site was associated with survival at a borderline significance level: 1485 (RR, 2.461; 95% CI, 0.960–6.309; P = 0.061), without amino acid substitution in the RH domain ( Table 3 ).

Between-group analysis showed a more favorable response to treatment in the high-AIC groups for ESAS nausea ( p = 0.027), EORTC dyspnea ( p = 0.039), and EORTC role functioning scores ( p = 0.031); with borderline significance for EORTC cognitive functioning ( p = 0.061).

Although the AUCs for ArEs were 0.826 and 0.714 for females and males, respectively, the difference showed borderline significance ( p = 0.061).