Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 0.0541.1× alpha
The complication rate for patients operated on for infectious indications (6.2%) was significantly higher than for obstructive indications (1.4%) ( p < 0.001) (Tables 2 , 3 ). In multivariate analysis, the most significant independent risk factors for complications were: Age at the time of surgery (OR 1.044, p = 0.004) Sex (male predominance, OR 2.354, p = 0.04) Indication for surgery (infectious predominance, OR 2.52, p = 0.054, borderline significance) The analysis revealed an additional risk of 4.4% for complications with each year of age.
borderline significancep<0.0541.1× alpha
Regarding use of LARCs, lower rates were observed in South Africa, Malawi, and Uganda relative to Zimbabwe; significantly lower in South Africa, aPRR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.26–0.57), p<0.001, borderline significance in Uganda, aPRR = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.42–1.01), p<0.054, while the lower rates in Malawi were not statistically significant, aPRR = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.64–1.19), p = 0.386.
borderline significanceP = .0541.1× alpha
Association of Clinicopathologic Parameters with pCR In the multivariable analysis, CEP17 duplication associated with a high percentage of pCR [odds ratio (OR) 6.55, 95% CI 1.25-34.29, P = .026] and TOP2A gene amplification showed a benefit with borderline significance (OR 6.97, 95% CI 0.96-50.12, P = .054; Table 3 ).
borderline significanceP = 0.0541.1× alpha
Additionally, univariate analysis revealed that a higher lymphocyte count (≥1.5×10 9 /L) showed borderline significance for improved DFS ( P = 0.054), while a lower monocyte count (<0.4×10 9 /L) was associated with a significantly better DFS ( P = 0.010).
borderline significanceP = .0541.1× alpha
Tertile-based analysis revealed a nonlinear dose–response pattern: compared with T1 (2.0–19.8 mmol/L), T3 (24.0–51.0 mmol/L) exhibited persistent protective effects in logistic regression (Model 3 OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64–0.93, P = .006) and Cox (Model 3 HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66–0.92, P = .003) models, while T2 (20.0–23.9 mmol/L) exhibited borderline significance in logistic regression (OR: 0.85, P = .054) but remained protective in time-to-event analysis (HR: 0.79, P = .002; Table 4 ). 4.