borderline significancep = 0.052
However, we found an inverse unadjusted relationship between the physical function dimension and the AIx_75, and this relationship achieved borderline significance after adjusting ( p = 0.052).
However, we found an inverse unadjusted relationship between the physical function dimension and the AIx_75, and this relationship achieved borderline significance after adjusting ( p = 0.052).
SPG performed better than LS, with borderline significance ( P =0.052).
Physical activity at work predicted LGI among men with borderline significance only (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.00–1.49, p = 0.052).
Smoking history (never, previous, and current smoking) correlated to blood cadmium (p<0.001), and with borderline significance to plaque cadmium/wet weight (p = 0.052).
Additionally, the P50 amplitude from the PERG showed borderline significance (r = 0.237, p = 0.052).
While significant risk reduction by 12% ( P = 0.029) in the incidence of any diabetes-related end point in the intensive treatment group was observed, nonfatal and fatal MI incidence was reduced by 16% with a borderline significance ( P = 0.052) ( 8 ).
Histological differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage were significant in univariate analyses for both DFS and OS but did not remain independent predictors in multivariate models, although late-stage disease showed borderline significance for OS (HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.99–4.06, p = 0.052).
Rate-of-aging in the Skin & Blood clock was marginally faster in HIV-infected men, with borderline significance ( p = 0.052).
Furthermore, when the cyst size was used in the ANCOVA model, the main effect of cyst size had borderline significance (F(2, 246)=2.984, p=0.052).
Diabetes was a condition with borderline significance ( p = 0.052).
Partly, this is possibly due to greater presence of SGA infants in our BW > 1,000-g group compared to that with weight ≤1,000 g, even if it is only borderline significance ( p = 0.052).
Comparing the total stress scores of the hospitals and job groups we found significant differences in nurses (p = 0.005) and physicists (p = 0.042) and a borderline significance in physicians (p = 0.052).
The tumor size had a borderline significance ( P = 0.052).
On the other hand Cox regression model did produce HR 2.552 CI95% 0.990 to 6.576 with borderline significance of p = 0.052.
Reduced global LSR dias (<0.85 S −1 ) independently predicted a 4-fold increased mortality in these patients, while mid-septal LS sys only showed borderline significance ( P = 0.052) on outcome.
The metastatic risk group demonstrated borderline significance ( p = 0.052).
At borderline significance, patients taking anti-CD38 or BCMA-targeting agents at the 4 th dose were more likely to have negative T-cell IGRA (adjusted OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.0-10.7, P =0.052).
In contrast, the RPL group showed borderline significance (P = 0.052), indicating some heterogeneity.
In addition, loading of material was included due to its borderline significance (P = 0.052).
The borderline significance observed for T3 (p = 0.052) suggests that the association may become clearer with a larger sample size or more targeted data.
At 12 months intervention, serum 25(OH) vitamin D was positively associated with insulin ( p =0.044), borderline significance with HOMA-IR ( p =0.052), and positively associated with HDL-cholesterol ( p =0.04).
In separate models, FIB-4>1.3 was significantly associated with KDIGO 3–4 (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.19; p=0.008), whereas BARD ≥2 demonstrated only borderline significance (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.21; p=0.052).
After multivariate analysis, only combined nodal status and preoperative CEA ( p = 0.033), no postoperative s-CT ( p = 0.001), positive margins ( p = 0.008), and, with borderline significance, age ( p = 0.052) were independently associated with PM. 4.
Comparisons between ROC curves for the modified scores compared with their original values are summarised in Table 3 , and show a significant difference for the HEMORR 2 HAGES (p = 0.028) score with borderline significance for the modified ATRIA score (p = 0.052).
In the multivariate analysis, only the combination of absent early hypoxia response and positive TPS remained a significant prognosticator for LRC (HR = 3.374, 95% CI 1.192 - 9.548, p = 0.022) and, with borderline significance, for PFS (HR = 2.752, 95% CI 0.992 - 7.631, p = 0.052).