borderline significancep = 0.05
2.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.039) and the CRP-positive area was larger, with borderline significance (29.6 ± 6.3 vs. 13.7 ± 6.4, p = 0.05).
2.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.039) and the CRP-positive area was larger, with borderline significance (29.6 ± 6.3 vs. 13.7 ± 6.4, p = 0.05).
In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, SSS was a significant predictor of death (odds ratio= 1.05, p=0.009), as well as the use of pharmacologic stress (odds ratio= 0.36, p=0.01), while DM did not appear as a significant predictor of death (odds ratio=0.91, p=0.7) and CAD had borderline significance (odds ratio=0.52, p=0.05).
Moreover, in the Levene’s Test for Homogeneity of Variance, the variance of psilocybin showed borderline significance ( p = 0.05002, N = 30, n = 7200) compared to placebo, suggesting a higher amount of switching and a greater flexibility in responses in the psilocybin group.
Univariate analysis identified that an age > 40 years, female sex, HBV genotype C, baseline HBsAg < 3.0 log 10 IU/mL, HBV DNA < 6 log 10 IU/mL, ALT < 5× ULN, platelet < 150 × 10 3 /uL were significantly associated with METAVIR fibrosis stages 3 and 4, while CLEC18 showed borderline significance ( P = 0.0501).
In contrast, when assessing the change in ‘other’ bat calls at willow sites over time we found borderline significance and an increase in recorded calls over time (F(1,152) = 3.90, p = 0.0501) (Fig. 2 ).
Overexpression of PPARγ induced expression of SDPR ( Fig 3B ), albeit with borderline significance (p = 0.0503 using a two-sided t-test, p = 0.02 using a one-sided t-test).
Differences in mean values of CTE were not significant ( p = 0.8981), while in the case of CSE, borderline significance was found ( p = 0.0503).
The differences in FGF 21 between HSI-I and HSI-non-I showed borderline significance ( p = 0.0503) after being adjusted for age and gender ( Figure 4 C). 4.
One study showed it had borderline significance by multivariate analysis ( P = 0.0506) [24] .
Similar trends, with borderline significance were shown at 90 days post-HSCT (85 ± 78 ng/ml vs. 37 ± 13 ng/ml, p=0.0506) ( Figure 4A ).
No significant differences were detected between both groups for the upper extremity but a borderline significance (p = 0.0506) indicated a tendency towards higher frequencies of distal radius fractures in the OPO group.
This difference was not significant for COL II ( p = 0.15); however, it had borderline significance for ACAN ( p = 0.0507).
The remaining perception variables were insignificant except for perception of control of famine with borderline significance, p = 0.0507.
For CTD screen, PR3 and Ro52, no significant difference between capillary and venous sample was observed, while borderline significance for RF IgM (p=0.0507) was found.
Tetranor-PGEM levels were also slightly increased (1.18-fold) after 4 weeks of tranilast administration with borderline significance ( p = 0.0507).
Visual Functional Parameter Correlations BCEA63 and BCEA95 positively correlated with LLVA with statistical significance ( p < 0.0001 for both), and with BCVA with a borderline significance ( p = 0.0508 and p = 0.0507, respectively).
For PFS, only docetaxel plus ramucirumab gave a significant benefit, of 1.2 months, in mean survival, and nivolumab showed borderline significance ( P = 0.0508) with 2.6 months (Additional file 1 : Figures S10–S12).
Overall, the statistical analysis of time to delivery of litter showed borderline significance of exposure ( p = 0.0509).
However, in male flies reared on HFD, a trend towards upregulation of glucose levels with borderline significance ( p = 0.0509) was observed.
Additionally, borderline significance was noted between the 1-week and intraoperative scores in the test group ( p = 0.051), suggesting consistent analgesic effects of the propolis gel ( Table 10 ).
MMR deficiency was associated with postmenopausal status, tumor grades 2–3, FIGO stages I–II ( p = 0.010, 0.011, 0.006), BMI < 25, and parous state (parity ≥ 1) with borderline significance ( p = 0.051, 0.064).
Men reported low levels of support for FGC in response to the direct question, 8.3% (95% CI [5.4–11.1]) rising to 18.5% (95% CI [8.7–28.3]) in response to the UCT, (at borderline significance, p = 0.051).
At bivariate analysis, AI-CAC was associated with borderline significance with 5-year ASCVD (adj-HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0–4.7, P = 0.051), while the ESC CV risk grading was not (adj-HR 1.8, 95% CI 0.6–6.2, P = 0.323).
Stratified by sex, women exhibited a significant linear trend ( p = 0.009), whereas men showed borderline significance ( p = 0.051).
Men (median = 28.5 years, range (25%–75%) = (16.5 – 37) were on average slightly older than women (median = 25, range = 19–43) with borderline significance ( p = 0.051).