Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep=0.051.0× alpha
Specifically, there were no differences in the occurrence of SGA and LGA, at birth, and no differences in weight, BMI, BMI z-scores or measures of adiposity (sum of four skinfold and/or BIA) at birth, 6-8 weeks or one year, except for birth length, which was lower in the intervention group compared to the usual-care group, but only in the adjusted analyses did it reach borderline significance levels (p=0.05). 3.3 Psychobehavioral outcomes In the overall offspring population, the mean Parenting Stress Index was 22.38, the mean night-time sleep duration was 639 minutes/night with a mean of 1.22 awakenings/night and 5% of mothers perceived their child’s sleep as “a very serious problem” ( Table 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.0501.0× alpha
Several histopathological parameters indicated a higher degree of biological aggression in the IHC-loss group: Tumor Necrosis: Microscopic coagulative necrosis was detected in 7 of 19 IHC-loss tumors (36.8%), whereas it was present in 36 of 195 wild-type tumors (18.5%) ( p = 0.050; borderline significance).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Given the borderline significance ( p = 0.05) of the interaction effects between noise conditions and stimuli, pairwise comparisons were conducted to further explore the effects of noise conditions and stimuli.
Auditory Sensory Gating: Effects of Noise
Biology (Basel) · 2024 · PMC11200888
borderline significancep=0.051.0× alpha
The benefit of prehabilitation appeared more pronounced, with borderline significance, in patients undergoing “other” (non-colorectal) surgeries (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.99, p=0.05) compared to those undergoing colorectal surgery (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.34, p=0.31).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Change in frequency of meals consumed with the family in front of the television was not a significant predictor of perceived increase in dietary healthfulness in males (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88–1.25, p = 0.601), and PSS score achieved only borderline significance in the male-only regression (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00–1.07, p = 0.05) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
For the secondary outcomes, there were significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (−0.22 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.39 to −0.04; p = 0.01; I 2 = 94%) and fasting insulin levels (−3.36 μIU/mL; 95% CI: −6.31 to −0.41; p = 0.03; I 2 = 97%), while a borderline significance in HOMA‐IR scores (−0.56; 95% CI: −1.12 to −0.01; p = 0.05; I 2 = 96%) but no significant differences in 2‐h OGTT or HbA 1 c measures.