Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significanceP = .051.0× alpha
The Begg test showed a borderline significance of publication bias for COVID‐19‐related severity outcome ( P = .05), and a significant publication bias for mortality ( P = .02), but no indication of publication bias for infection ( P = .84).
borderline significanceP = 0.051.0× alpha
The score summarizing variants unrelated to complement or lipid metabolism was higher in AMD (mean ± SD = 0.03 ± 0.02) compared with AFVD (mean ± SD = −0.15 ± 0.05, P = 0.004), and showed a borderline significance level for being lower in AFVD compared with controls (mean ± SD = −0.02 ± 0.05, P = 0.05; Fig. 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
reported that diclofenac 50 mg tablets taken nightly by 26 adult patients with nocturia (⩾2 nightly voids) due to nocturnal polyuria conferred significant benefit compared with placebo, with nocturia frequency improving from 2.7 to 2.3 voids ( p < 0.004) and nocturnal polyuria index improving from 0.44 to 0.39 ( p < 0.001), as well as borderline significance observed for nocturnal urine volume (802–745 ml, p = 0.05). 126 Notably, the significant shift in 24-h urine production toward the daytime period (i.e., decreased nocturnal polyuria index) is consistent with well-controlled physiologic evidence on the effect of diclofenac on renal function, charact
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
All relevant variables retrieved from univariate analysis together with duration of infertility -that showed borderline significance (p = 0.05) on univariate analysis -were subsequently included in the multivariate analysis of factors related to the top quality blastocyst formation rate.
borderline significancep=0.051.0× alpha
Consistent with the previously published study ( Gursul et al., 2018 ), the gentle touch intervention resulted in a 39% reduction in the magnitude of the noxious-evoked brain activity, but a significant intervention effect was not observed (although the result indicated borderline significance) when baseline sensitivity was not accounted for, likely due to the lack of power with this sample size (linear regression, t = 1.95, p=0.05, Figure 3B , Study 2 indicates a power of 40% for a sample of this size without accounting for baseline sensitivity, Figure 2B ).
borderline significanceP =.051.0× alpha
There were no statistically significant differences between low COX-2 immunostaining and high COX-2 immunostaining for most of the clinicopathological parameters with the exception of tumor multifocality where high COX-2 immunostaining showed borderline significance with more cases where multifocality was present ( P =.05) ( Table 4 ).