Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep=0.051.0× alpha
Consistent with the previously published study ( Gursul et al., 2018 ), the gentle touch intervention resulted in a 39% reduction in the magnitude of the noxious-evoked brain activity, but a significant intervention effect was not observed (although the result indicated borderline significance) when baseline sensitivity was not accounted for, likely due to the lack of power with this sample size (linear regression, t = 1.95, p=0.05, Figure 3B , Study 2 indicates a power of 40% for a sample of this size without accounting for baseline sensitivity, Figure 2B ).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
reported that diclofenac 50 mg tablets taken nightly by 26 adult patients with nocturia (⩾2 nightly voids) due to nocturnal polyuria conferred significant benefit compared with placebo, with nocturia frequency improving from 2.7 to 2.3 voids ( p < 0.004) and nocturnal polyuria index improving from 0.44 to 0.39 ( p < 0.001), as well as borderline significance observed for nocturnal urine volume (802–745 ml, p = 0.05). 126 Notably, the significant shift in 24-h urine production toward the daytime period (i.e., decreased nocturnal polyuria index) is consistent with well-controlled physiologic evidence on the effect of diclofenac on renal function, charact
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
son between metals in this group revealed significantly higher fusion rates with strontium compared to magnesium ( p < 0.001), silicon, and tantalum ( p < 0.001 for all comparisons) and significantly higher fusion rates with titanium compared to magnesium ( p = 0.002) and tantalum ( p = 0.005) with borderline significance compared to silicon ( p = 0.05).
borderline significancep = 0.0501.0× alpha
In CMML, ASXL1 and TET2 mutations were associated with a trend toward better prognosis compared with wild-type (HR 0.21, p = 0.052; HR 0.25, p = 0.057, respectively), while U2AF1 mutations were associated with adverse prognosis in univariate analysis with borderline significance (HR 12.20, p = 0.050).