Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
A linear regression analysis suggested that there was only a marginal effect of the proportion of EZH2-expressing tumor cells on the crude disease-free survival of young patients, with borderline significance (F(1,66) = 3.95, p = 0.05, with an R 2 = 0.06 and a regression coefficient of −0.4); thus, the one percent increase in the proportion of EZH2-expressing cells might be related to a 0.4-month decrease in the predicted DFS with great scatter in the data.
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Based on these findings, the null hypothesis—stating that attachment orientation does not affect the rotational accuracy—cannot be fully rejected in the overall model, the findings should be interpreted as indicative of a trend toward improved rotational control with oblique crescent-shaped attachments rather than definitive superiority, given the borderline significance ( p = 0.05) and the moderate effect size (d = 0.5) observed.
borderline significancep = 0.0501.0× alpha
In these adjusted analyses, the higher prevalence of malignancy in cLP-only patients remained significant compared with oLP-only patients (adjusted OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.45–5.04; p = 0.002) and LPP-only patients (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.07–3.31; p = 0.028), with borderline significance compared with gLP-only patients (adjusted OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.00–7.35; p = 0.050).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
For the secondary outcomes, there were significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (−0.22 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.39 to −0.04; p = 0.01; I 2 = 94%) and fasting insulin levels (−3.36 μIU/mL; 95% CI: −6.31 to −0.41; p = 0.03; I 2 = 97%), while a borderline significance in HOMA‐IR scores (−0.56; 95% CI: −1.12 to −0.01; p = 0.05; I 2 = 96%) but no significant differences in 2‐h OGTT or HbA 1 c measures.
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
son between metals in this group revealed significantly higher fusion rates with strontium compared to magnesium ( p < 0.001), silicon, and tantalum ( p < 0.001 for all comparisons) and significantly higher fusion rates with titanium compared to magnesium ( p = 0.002) and tantalum ( p = 0.005) with borderline significance compared to silicon ( p = 0.05).