Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

The following factors remained statistically associated at the end of the analysis: age equal or over 35 years (OR=3.11; 95% CI:1.53-6.31), previous hypertension (OR=2.52; 95% CI:1.09-5.80), history of abortion (borderline significance–OR=1.61; 95% CI:0.97-2.68), 4–5 prenatal consultations (OR=1.78; 95% CI:1.05-3.01) and 1–3 prenatal consultations (OR=1.89; 95% CI:1.03-3.49).
Birth weight SDS was positively associated with RMR with borderline significance (ß = 35 kcal/day, 95% CI −2, 72), however it was displaced from models that included either adult height or FFM, indicating that the BW association was explained by its association with adult size (birth weight SDS and FFM, r = 0.31, P = 0.018).
We proceeded with a multivariate Cox regression model including significant indices (age, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, TSPO-PET signal of the tumor, T1 contrast–enhanced volume, T2 hyperintensity volume) as well as MGMT, which likely did not reach significance in univariate Cox regression due to the lower sample size compared to a previous study ( 48 ), and glucocorticoid medication due to borderline significance.
On the contrary, counterclockwise rotation was significantly related to lower risk of composite CVD (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87–0.99]), CVD mortality (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65–0.88), and non‐CVD deaths (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85–0.99 [borderline significance with heart failure]).
Although the results of our study were not statistically significant, the difference in median R sleep duration between the EDS (44.5 [16.5–63.5] min) and no-EDS group (61.3 [38.5–82.6] min) had a P value of 0.056 (borderline significance), which could be attributed to the small sample size.