“borderline significance”

Similarly, age, height, and weight were not significant predictors, although weight approached borderline significance ( p = 0.108).

However, children who were breastfed were more frequently treated although only at a borderline significance (p = 0.11).

uniformis with borderline significance (OR: 3.27; 95% CI: 0.73–14.72; p = 0.110).

In the final multivariate model, implant exposure remained a significant predictor of unsuccessful salvage (OR = 0.19, p = 0.04), while prolonged outpatient antibiotic therapy demonstrated borderline significance (OR = 0.89 per additional day, p = 0.11). 4.

The effect was graded by academic rank, with an OR for professors relative to instructors of 0.51 ( P =0.001) and an OR for associate professors relative to instructors of 0.77 (borderline significance, P =0.11).

Outpatient antibiotic therapy demonstrated borderline significance wherein longer courses were associated with lower odds of salvage (odds ratio = 0.89 per additional day, P = 0.11, 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.03).

We also analysed four CD patients following a gluten containing diet and we again observed higher CX3CL1 gene expression in aCD, although with only a borderline significance when compared to controls ( p = 0.11).

Although event-free survival was reported as zero in both cohorts, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group demonstrated borderline significance ( p = 0.11) [ 103 ].

E-selectin was lowered with borderline significance during atorvastatin treatment (-7%, p = 0.11), E-selectin reduction during fenofibrate therapy was statistically significant (-10%, p < 0.05).

work on geographic disparities in tobacco knowledge.[ 12 ] Notably, the presence of young children showed only borderline significance ( P = 0.110), contrasting with Western studies[ 13 ]—a difference possibly attributable to cultural variations in child protection practices.

Adherence decreased the risk of death among patients with CTP stage C (HR=0.657, 0.428–1.008, p=0.055) with borderline significance, but not in patients with CTP stages A and B (HR=0.701, 0.452–1.086, p=0.11).

Moreover, written responses showed an increased incidence of references to electrostatics, shifting from 16% of preactivity responses to 35% of postactivity responses, although this increase only showed borderline significance ( p = 0.11) in statistical analyses ( Table 4 ).

Borderline significance was also observed in endocrine irAEs (r = 0.44, P = 0.11) and hepatic irAEs (r = 0.55, P = 0.05) (Fig. 5 ).

Interaction tests showed borderline significance for both age ( p = 0.110) and sex ( p = 0.083), suggesting potential effect modification by these demographic factors. 3.5.

Other variables did not demonstrate significance, although test algorithm showed borderline significance ( P = 0.11), exhibiting a trend toward better PSD scores in the game-based group.

No significant differences in histology, cancer stage, age, or sex were observed between controls and patients with myelotoxicity ( P Histology = 0.121, P Stage = 0.683, P Age = 0.357, P Sex = 0.289), and smoking status showed borderline significance between the two groups ( P = 0.112).

In fact, the green bodyweight curve (wildtype mice) was consistently above the blue curve (aP2- ALOX15 mice) and statistical evaluation (two-way repeated measure ANOVA) of the two curves suggested a borderline significance ( p = 0.1130).

Otherwise, the trend was statistically significant in either cohort, except for the atrophic and goitrous/nodular variants in Catania, as they only approached borderline significance (P = 0.113 and 0.121, respectively).

Multivariate analysis indicated gHRRm (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.06–6.32; p = 0.041; Table 7 ) as an independent predictive factor of pCR in patients with TNBC, whilst gBRCA1/2m showed borderline significance (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 0.84–6.02; p = 0.118; Table 8 ).

However, when the mutations were added in the multivariable analysis, the effect of sex on survival lost its borderline significance (HR 0.66, p = 0.118), suggesting that the difference in mutational profile between males and females, may at least partly explain the difference in survival between males and females.

Although diabetes showed borderline significance ( p = 0.12), it was included based on clinical guidelines (2024 KDIGO) and its contribution to model fit, serving as a critical covariate to enhance the model’s clinical relevance and predictive performance.

Although the positive association with rs3803662 remained, it was of only borderline significance ( P = 0.12).

prausnitzii abundance in rectal swab samples compared with the placebo group [–0.060 ± 0.730 (–1.20%) compared with –0.087 ± 0.516 (1.72%); borderline significance with adjusted P = 0.12].

In addition, there was a tendency toward more advanced stages of lymphoma in the B symptoms group, with borderline significance ( p = 0.12).

School-based NO and BC had borderline significance in the models ( p < 0.12).