Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significanceP = 0.0460.9× alpha
IPL division was associated with a greater degree of postoperative bronchial angle change after left-sided surgery, reaching borderline significance at 3 months (68.1 ± 7.2° vs. 78.1 ± 7.8°, P = 0.046) and poorer 6-month outcomes, including smaller lung volume (3615 ± 475 mL vs. 3392 ± 489 mL, P = 0.027), a trend towards lower FEV1% (73.04 ± 9.36 vs. 69.06 ± 10.11, P = 0.049), lower DLCO (80.82 ± 10.35 vs. 76.06 ± 11.08, P = 0.033), and lower total LCQ-MC score (17.70 ± 1.72 vs. 16.98 ± 1.69, P = 0.042).
borderline significancep = 0.0460.9× alpha
For BMI, the association with the Rapid Progression group was inconsistent, showing no significance with missing data exclusion (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.94–1.8, p = 0.106), but borderline significance in the 10-year follow-up (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1–1.76, p = 0.046), whereas the association with the Moderate Progression group remained robust (missing data exclusion: OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01–1.47, p = 0.038; 10-year follow-up: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02–1.43, p = 0.028).
borderline significanceP = 0.0460.9× alpha
However, PERMANOVA of the thetaYC distances revealed borderline significance ( P = 0.046) for the results of comparisons of the bacterial structures in the adenoids of the SOM group and the HP group but no difference between the bacterial community structures of the tonsil samples from the SOM group and HP group ( P = 0.091).
borderline significanceP = 0.0460.9× alpha
Pearson’s correlation revealed no significant difference along the rostrocaudal axis ( r = 0.012, 95% CI −0.048 to 0.073, P = 0.69; Figure 5B ) and dorsoventral axis ( r = 0.009, 95% CI −0.052 to 0.069, P = 0.78; Figure 5C ), while borderline significance was reached with respect to the lateral position from the midline ( r = −0.061, 95% CI −0.122 to −0.0001, P = 0.046; Figure 5D ).
borderline significanceP = 0.0460.9× alpha
Malnutrition has a negative impact on fetal growth, including head circumference.[ 59 60 ] The reproductive process study of the Dutch famine in 1944–1945 showed that head circumference declined 2.7% during the famine, and rose 2.4% afterward.[ 61 ] Randomized controlled studies showed that adequate maternal and fetal nutrition improved prenatal head growth,[ 62 63 ] the difference still existed 7 weeks after birth (corrected value), but catch-up growth at 36 weeks narrowed the gap to borderline significance ( P = 0.046).[ 62 63 ] The economic condition may contribute to a false diagnosis of microcephaly, and postdiagnosis follow-up is necessary to make a definite diagnosis or complete correct diagnosis, considering the limitation of the operational definition in the size of head circumference.[ 64 ] While microcephaly is often identified after 20 weeks of gestation by ultrasonography, it's much earlier than the possible catch-up opportunity.
borderline significancep = 0.04670.9× alpha
Using this assay, we could show that compounds FMP-503533, FMP-214534, FMP-401319 and to a slightly lesser extend FMP-214219 significantly inhibited translocation and processing of CRF 1 R-pPL (p < 0.0001) whereas compound FMP-208236 only had a minor effect on translocation inhibition, although with borderline significance (18% reduced translocation; p = 0.0467) ( Fig 5A , the red arrow indicates the SPcNC fragment, i.e. the translocated CRF 1 R-pPL without signal peptide).
borderline significancep =0.0470.9× alpha
As there was a significant correlation in the larger sample (i.e., n =70), and the comparison of values of r showed borderline significance (i.e., p =0.047) it was decided that the two schools could be considered comparable in terms of the relationships between mathematics and the cognitive measures used in this study.
borderline significancep = 0.0470.9× alpha
Consistent results were obtained from maximum likelihood (OR: 5.63, 95% CI: 1.96–16.17, p = 0.001), weighted median (OR: 7.24, 95% CI: 1.83–28.73, p = 0.005), penalized weighted median (OR: 7.24, 95% CI: 1.86–28.14, p = 0.004), and IVW radial regression (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: 2.19–12.85, p = 0.001), while the weighted mode method yielded a directionally similar effect with borderline significance (OR: 9.10, 95% CI: 1.26–65.59, p = 0.047).