“borderline significance”

In addition, the likelihood of participation in DSME among agricultural/forestry/fishery worker and homemaker/student was higher at PHIs, with borderline significance (0.05≤ p <0.10).

Only the factors that showed statistical significance or borderline significance ( P <0.1) in the univariate analysis were added stepwise to the multivariate analysis.

When analysis of variance (ANOVA) detected effects above borderline significance ( p < .10), post hoc power analyses were performed using the simr package [ 73 ], and a 95% confidence interval was reported (number of simulations: 1000).

Because the sample size is small, associations with borderline significance (0.5 < p < 0.10) are also reported.

Moreover, overexpression of the LDLR in the primary human hepatocytes appeared to promote apo(a) internalization, although at borderline significance (p = 0.10) ( Fig 2B ).

Variables demonstrating statistical significance (P < 0.05), as well as variables considered clinically relevant based on prior evidence that had borderline significance (P < 0.10) in univariate analyses, were considered for inclusion in multivariable models.

When building a logistic regression model, the variables with borderline significance between the sexes at baseline (P ≤ 0.1: age, hypertension, NIHSS of 0 at baseline) were independent risk factors for poor functional outcome (P = 0.001) but none of them were independent risk factors for poor social outcome.

Factors with at least borderline significance ( P < 0.1) in the univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate analysis.

A p-value of <0.05 (two sided) was used to denote statistical significance, though associations reaching borderline significance (0.05 < p < 0.1) were also identified as being of potential interest.

In univariate analysis, parameters that show statistical or borderline significance (p<0.1) were included in multivariate analysis.

Carfilzomib alone or DC101 alone also prolonged the survival compared with the control, with borderline significance (carfilzomib; p = 0.1, DC101; p = 0.07).

All four EET isomers analyzed showed borderline significance ( p < 0.1) in the mental scale with positive coefficients.

All independent variables that showed differences of more than borderline significance ( p <0.1) for NAFLD were entered in a multivariate logistic regression model in order to determine the independent association with NAFLD.

On the other hand, having a history of diabetes was a significant risk factor, and having a history of hypertension was found to be associated with a borderline significance level (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10), with an increased risk of carotid atherosclerosis in the patient group of the LMN cohort.

Borderline significance ( P < .10) was also indicated and discussed.

In addition, the number of epileptogenic zone (p = 0.057), although not significant at the conventional 0.05 level, demonstrated borderline significance (p < 0.1) and was therefore included for further evaluation.

Hypertension and diabetes exhibited borderline significance ( P < 0.10) (Table 1 ).

Factors with significance or borderline significance (p < 0.1) in the univariate analyses and those identified as pertinent factors in the literature were then included in a multivariable regression model with backward stepwise variable selection.

ALR increased as DMNQ was increased (F(4,84)=5.44, P <0.001) with this increase significantly greater in AD LCLs (F(4,105)=3.97, P <0.005), due to significantly higher ALR in AD LCLs at 10 μ M ( t (105)=3.86, P <0.0005) with borderline significance at 12.5 μ M ( t (105)=1.78, P <0.10).

The variables with significance or borderline significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analyses and those considered relevant from the literature were included in a multivariate regression model using stepwise backward selection.

Factors with significance or borderline significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analyses and those related as pertinent factors in the literature were then included in a multivariable regression model with backward stepwise variable selection.

Statistical significance was defined as a P value <.05; nonsignificant trend or borderline significance were defined as a P value <.1.

Significance was set at p value < 0.05 but borderline significance of p < 0.1 was also considered in the post hoc tests.

Risk factors with borderline significance (P<0.1) in univariate analysis were chosen for further evaluation by multivariate logistic regression.

While the EPHA2 signal showed the trend towards increase upon irradiation in all compared categories (adherent HCC-44 cells, adherent A549 cells, and A549 spheroids), the increase was not statistically significant due to high variation between the experiments; in case of HCC-44, borderline significance was achieved ( P < 0.1).