Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significance”

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,572 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep=0.071.4× alpha
Participating men (vs non-participant men and male participants w/o follow-up) were more likely to report being HIV positive at borderline significance (3.4% vs 1.1%, p=0.07); however, there were no significant differences in self-reported HIV prevalence between participating women (vs non-participant women and female participants w/o follow-up).
borderline significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Contrasted with the borderline significance observed prior to exclusion ( p = 0.07), the sensitivity analysis confirmed that digital health interventions exert a stable and significant promoting effect on light physical activity in perinatal women. 3.4.3 Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) Data for MVPA were pooled from seven studies ( Figure 6 ), yielding a mean difference of 1.37 min/day (MD = 1.37, 95% CI: −0.53, 3.26).
borderline significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Although alterations in PI3K, TGF-Beta, and RTK/RAS pathways were not statistically significant, borderline significance was observed in genes related to these pathways, including EGFR ( p = 0.07), FGFR1 ( p = 0.05), FGFR2 ( p = 0.05), and PTPN11 ( p = 0.05) in the PI3K pathway and SMAD4 ( p = 0.08) in the TGF-Beta pathway.
borderline significanceP = 0.071.4× alpha
Similar to the results of primary outcome analyses, meta-analysis of the composite outcome of ‘cardiovascular death or hospitalizations (or urgent visits) due to heart failure’ exhibited significant improvement in response to treatment with SGLT2i at all the LVEF levels though again, compared to patients with LVEF above 30%, the subgroup of patients with the baseline LVEF of 30% or less showed a stronger response to gliflozins at borderline significance (HR: 0.69, 95%CI: 0.61 to 0.76 vs 0.78, 95%CI: 0.71 to 0.85; P = 0.07).
borderline significanceP = .0701.4× alpha
Significant better results ( P < .05) were detected in the open-skilled physical activity group when compared with the no physical activity group in the Benton Judgement of Line Orientation, Stroop (CW), Stroop (W), SRL-SRS (Evaluation) and borderline significance ( P = .070) was found for Trail Making B.
borderline significancep = .071.4× alpha
For multiple regression analyses, after controlling for the effects of gender, age, and pretest scores, group significantly predicted participants’ intention to use Internet excessively in the coming 2 years ( β = −.07, p = .02) and predicted smoking intention with borderline significance ( β = −.06, p = .07).