Although the severe dengue outcome based on the WHO 2009 dengue classification was barely statistically significant with P value of 0.049 (95% CI = 1.01–32.64), it is likely to have a large clinical significance with about six times higher risk of having severe dengue among DENV-HIV patients compared with DENV patients.
← all phrases
“barely statistically significant”
In the literature
It is also worth noting that the same type of analysis done in the dialysis patient population of the corresponding Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease: Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Daprodustat-Dialysis (ASCEND-D) trial was barely statistically significant [ 84 ].
The association found with low performance in the MMSE was barely statistically significant.
If we regress child health on all parental resources simultaneously the effect sizes of these variables diminish leaving father's education and income only barely statistically significant while employment status loses its significance (Model 4).
We found a relative enhancement of the count rate of 0.30 ± 0.23%, which is barely statistically significant.
Comparison of free wall and septal samples indicated higher phosphorylation levels in the free wall that was barely statistically significant (see Supplementary Figure 2 ).
2 ). When all studies were combined, the pooled HR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73–1.00; P = 0.05), suggesting a barely statistically significant benefit of CRT.
Three additional small blocks of significant segregation distortion were also identified: (1) one block involved two widely separated markers and was barely statistically significant at position 70.5 in the male Nco11 map ( Figure 3A ); (2) another block involved four markers, two in each of two widely separated regions on Nco3; (3) and the final block involved 32 markers at position 52.2–56.9 cM in the female Nco5 map ( Figure S2 ).
Effects on total non-vertebral fractures were barely statistically significant, and depend on inclusion of rib and sternal fractures in the composite endpoint.
Instead, in the two months immediately before April, when the diffusion of COVID-19 in Italy was starting, we find a moderate and barely statistically significant decrease in the number of new donors (as expected, no COVID-19 effect is found for January).
The differences were barely statistically significant, and no significance was found in our post-hoc analysis.
Although barely statistically significant, this gap may reflect minor differences in the foldamer folding possibly related to variations in its intramolecular interaction network.
inary glucose concentration and μ that concentration in the absence of these sources of variation. y ijk = μ + M i + P j + e ijk (1) This analysis found that there were very highly significant differences between participants ( p < 10 −4 ), as expected; however, that between methods/techniques was barely statistically significant, and the only difference found between these four form of analyses using further analysis by Tukey’s highest significant difference (HSD) test, was that between 400 MHz 1 H NMR-determined glucose levels and those obtained from the above dipstick approach, the latter being significantly greater than the former ( p = 0.033).
The differences between the mean values in all cases are on the order of 0.01 Å and are barely statistically significant.
In the US, it was only barely statistically significant.