“at the threshold of significance”

15 In fact, while significant differences can be observed, certain variables are at the threshold of significance ( p = 0.051 and 0.084).

Regarding age, no statistically significant correlations were found with the other variables, although the association with frailty was at the threshold of significance ( p = 0.052).

3 c): only a very small difference in IS/AAR was seen (82.1 ± 8.6%; 7% less than the vehicle control), at the threshold of significance ( P = 0.0562).

Analysis of the intersection of 50 CNVs revealed a P-value at the threshold of significance (P = 0.057) presumably influenced by CNVPartition which did not reveal any significant association.

High supervision time at t0 lay at the threshold of significance with p = .058.

Variability in the HAM-D scores seems to be explained by the differences in Beta 1, Beta 2 and Delta, with a model in which the probability value associated with F [3, 3] = 8.268 is at the threshold of significance ( p =.058).

Associations between BMI and CSF AD core biomarkers and cognitive function In all participants, MLR models showed that continuous BMI variables were negatively correlated with the concentration of CSF P-tau (β = −0.29, p = 3.76 × 10 −5 ), T-tau (β = −2.51, p = 8.53 × 10 −5 ), P-tau/Aβ 42 (β = −6.51 × 10 −4 , p = 3.39 × 10 −6 ), and T-tau/Aβ 42 (β = −5.60 × 10 −3 , p = 2.71 × 10 −6 ), but the positive association with CSF Aβ 42 was at the threshold of significance (β = 6.31, p = 0.059) after controlling for aforementioned covariates ( Figure 2 and Supplemental Table 2A ).

However, results for dysuria were at the threshold of significance, which indicates that the effect of metronidazole and probiotics on dysuria was greater than the effect of metronidazole alone ( P = 0.06) [ 27 ].

However, the difference in POD 1 values between the groups was at the threshold of significance (p = 0.071).

The interaction between food security and nutrition literacy revealed a finding at the threshold of significance (β = 0.051, p = 0.082 ), indicating a potential moderating effect (Table 5 ).

Although this trend was at the threshold of significance ( p = 0.086), it prompts intriguing questions regarding hepatic remodeling.

Similar to BMI, this relationship was insignificant (being at the threshold of significance, P = 0.0880.

GSH Differences between exposition to both stressors were pronounced significantly within muscle tissue and at the threshold of significance in liver (Experiment × Tissue interaction; Table 2 ). 3.2.2.

This moderating effect holds however at the threshold of significance, and is present only in one model using multiple imputation, and therefore needs further investigation.

At the threshold of significance, gastrointestinal involvement [P(β) = 97.5%] was associated with the presence of fever episodes.

In our study there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sexual self-care, although considering “source of sexual information” as a confounding factor, the results approached at the threshold of significance.

An additional nonessential subunit of the nuclear RNA exosome ( RRP6 ) was at the threshold of significance, using default Balony settings ( Figure 2A ).

Furthermore, additional ablation was at the threshold of significance associated with PeAF free survival (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.16–1.01).

Instead, education level was almost at the threshold of significance for women for the HLQ6 score.

A genome-wide association study reported one association at the threshold of significance with the rs300774 SNP, located in the 2p25 region containing ACP1 gene.

Here we find that this effect is right at the threshold of significance, and may be slightly underpowered (see Supplementary Material ) and so should be interpreted with caution.

Employment status was not significantly different between the groups, with 75.3% of cases being employed compared to 71.8% of controls ( P -value = .053), which was at the threshold of significance.

The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann–Whitney at the threshold of significance of 5% were applied to evaluate significant differences in use diversities between sex, generation and ethnolinguistic groups for each climatic zone [ 66 ].

Further to what is listed as major concerns by both reviewers below, (2a) A major concern that arose in the editorial-reviewer discussions is the following: The biperiden effects are either non-significant vs placebo or just at the threshold of significance (SVC) in samples of ~25 per group, so we deem it unlikely that these effects could be very informative at the individual level.

After correction for multiple testing using the false discovery rate (FDR), the associations with multiple ICDs and hypersexuality remained at the threshold of significance (q = 0.061).