Barely Significant
← all phrases

“an increasing trend”

63,972 sentences · 63,972 papers · 107,686 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendp = 0.0330.7× alphagold
Whereas in comparison to baseline (T0) reduced relative abundance at the end of the study (T3) was noted in the case of Actinomycetota (from 2.1 to 0.7%; p = 0.016), Eggerthellaceae (from 1.9 to 0.5%; p = 0.008), and Enterorhabdus (from 1.2 to 0.4%; p = 0.009), an increasing trend from pretreatment (T1) was presented by Ruminoccus (from 1.3 to 3.2%; p = 0.033) ( Figure S2 ).
an increasing trendp = 0.0330.7× alphagold
When analyzing the approved values, there was an increasing trend in the previous period ( p = 0.033), soon after there was no significant change ( p = 0.254) and no significant change in the pattern in the later period ( p = 0.155), although apparently there is a breakpoint on the day of the disaster, which is not significant (Fig. 4 ).
an increasing trendP = 0.0350.7× alphagold
In addition, Lin et al ., observed that, among maintenance hemodialysis patients, the GSTM 1 null genotype was associated with a significantly lower antioxidant capacity than the GSTM+ genotype.[ 20 ] The null/low polymorphisms of the GSTM 1 and GSTT 1 genes have been associated with the risk of developing ESRD in North Indian patients.[ 17 ] In addition, Singh et al ., reported that patients with transplant therapy demonstrated an increasing trend toward carrying the GSTM 1 null genotype (51.3%) versus healthy controls (40.4%) with a risk of about 1.5-fold ( P = 0.035), and patients with a variant genotype of GSTM 1 were at the higher risk of transplant rejection.[ 21 ] The frequencies of important functional mutations and alleles result in broad ethnic variation.
an increasing trendp = 0.0360.7× alphagold
Whilst no temporal or seasonal trends in monthly isolation rates were detected, either for individual infection types or in aggregate ( p > 0.1 using Bartel’s rank test), the 3GCR frequency showed an increasing trend ( p = 0.036 using Bartel’s rank test for trend, see Fig. 1a ), rising from mean 15% (range 10–21% per month) in the first nine months of the study to mean 34% (27–46% per month) in the final three months ( p = 0.0002, using test of difference in proportions of 3GCR between the two periods).