Barely Significant
← all phrases

“an increasing trend”

63,972 sentences · 63,972 papers · 107,686 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendp = 0.0280.6× alphagold
However, there were four countries showing an increasing trend of ovarian cancer, including India (AAPC = 6.89, 95% C.I. 0.95 to 13.18, p = 0.028), Belarus (AAPC = 6.69, 95% C.I. 2.48 to 11.08, p = 0.002), African Americans in the United States: (AAPC = 4.90, 95% C.I. 0.50 to 9.48, p = 0.033), and Japan (AAPC = 4.00, 95% C.I. 0.88 to 7.21, p = 0.018). 4.
an increasing trendP=0.0290.6× alphagold
When separating the total volume of WMH into PVWMH and DWMH, for the annual decrease in CBF, there was an increasing trend in PVWMH volume (Model 1: coefficient =−0.26, 95% CI: −0.049 to −0.003; P=0.029; Model 2: coefficient =−0.24, 95% CI: −0.046 to −0.002; P=0.032; Model 3: coefficient =−0.23, 95% CI: −0.047 to 0.002; P=0.074), whereas this increasing trend was not found in DWMH volume (all P>0.05).
an increasing trendp = 0.02910.6× alphagold
Those treated with VEGF-A165 or VEGF-A189 solely demonstrated an increasing trend (VEGF-A121: 12.30 ± 1.607, n = 4, p = 0.0291; VEGF-A145: 14.94 ± 1.620, n = 4, p = 0.0282; VEGF-A165: 11.80 ± 1.750, n = 4, p = 0.1715; VEGF-A189: 12.21 ± 2.400, n = 4, p = 0.3091; VEGF-A121-145: 19.25 ± 1.687, n = 4, p = 0.0289; VEGF-A121-145-189: 8.800 ± 0.6996, n = 4, p = 0.0267).
an increasing trendp = 0.030.6× alphagold
During SLS of the trailing limb, the DP values decreased linearly with increasing obstacle height for most CRP curves ( p < 0.05, partial h 2 > 0.18; Table 4 ), except for the knee-ankle of the trailing limb showing an increasing trend ( p = 0.03, partial h 2 = 0.20; Table 4 ).
an increasing trendp = 0.0300.6× alphagold
Nevertheless, in the color-word incongruent test, compared to HC and PD-NC, PD-MCI showed an increasing trend of all the FC measures and the differences in RS l ( p = 0.030), RS r ( p = 0.009), and GE ( p = 0.007) reached statistical significance between the PD-MCI and HC groups, and RS r was the only parameter that differed significantly between the PD-MCI and PD-NC patients ( p = 0.044).