Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Statistical analysis found that there were 38 ortholog groups significantly (or almost significant) enriched in the HBP group (summarized in Supplementary Table 6 ), and there were four ortholog groups significantly enriched in healthy control.
Colloid Versus Tubular IPMC All of eight studies investigating colloid type and tubular type IPMC for the main pathological characteristics ( Table 2 ) reported significant or almost significant trend towards less nodal metastasis in colloid carcinomas (16–29% versus 37–63% in tubular type).
This result is more evident in relation to steel plants, with an almost significant 90% excess risk in age 0–1, and with some evidence of excess of hospitalization for neoplasms also in the 0-19- (S – males n = 121, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 1.08 (0.90–1.28), (1-p)%=55%, females n = 102, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 1.12 (0.93–1.35), (1-p)%=71%) and 20-29-years age groups (S – males n = 145, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 0.99 (0.80–1.22), (1-p)%=6%, females n = 140, SHR pooled (90%CI) = 1.08 (0.85–1.36), (1-p)%=44%) (Additional file 2).
After a 5-min SP test, however, we observed a significant (or almost significant) increase of c-Fos induction specifically in the MeA and NAc shell, but not in the LSD, LSV, or NAc core (Supplementary Fig. 8 ; one-way ANOVA, LSV— F 2,12 = 0.847, p = 0.453; LSD— F 2,12 = 2.327, p = 0.140; NAc core— F 2,12 = 0.444, p = 0.652; NAc shell— F 2,12 = 3.767, p = 0.057; MeA— F 2,12 = 7.161, p = 0.009).
With regard to the changes in the local landscape, the almost significant difference found between the fishing colonies of Z11 and Z20 may be related to the fact that the fishermen in the latter group spend far more time in the study area because their fishing practice expose them more to estuarine environments rather than sea environments.
Miscarriage In a case-control study, strongly significant associations were reported between serum concentrations of PFAS (perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and, especially, perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)) and miscarriage, and almost significant associations with PFHxS exposure, while several studies reported no consistent link to miscarriage and stillbirths in a population with high PFOA exposure [ 79 ]. 3.4.3.