The difference within the two groups was almost significant ( p = .08) (Figure 2d ; Table S1 ). 3.4.
← all phrases
“almost significant”
Sighted at
p=0.06
In the literature
Independent t-tests showed no statistical significance, either for any of the neurophysiological measurements, or for neuropsychological battery, except for scale of Re-Appraisal in ERQ (R ERQ) [t (28) = 2.64, p = 0.014, d = 0.97], and almost significant for LF/HF ratio FFT [t (25) = −1.78, p = 0.08, d = −0.69].
In SAECs, inhibition of miR‐185‐5p causes a mild upregulation, which is nonsignificant (fold of 1.14 ± 0.09; p > 0.05; Figure 1d ), being this increase almost significant in the SAECs treated with IL‐13 (fold of 1.22 ± 0.10; p = 0.08; Figure 1d ), which might indicate that IL‐13 treatment could enhance the effect of the inhibitor of miR‐185‐5p by augmenting POSTN expression in absence of miR‐185‐5p.
Significant interactions were observed for the following feeding practices: restriction for health ( p = 0.003), restriction for weight ( p = 0.0004), emotional feeding ( p = 0.02) and the interaction was almost significant for food as a reward ( p = 0.08).
The interaction between MTB race time and training modality was almost significant (p = 0.08), with a smaller ES in HIT vs.
There was an almost significant effect of mean mass, with heavier groups with a faster latency (t = 1.86, df = 14, p = 0.08).
Fig 3 shows that for the non-fasting group, there was an almost significant correlation between the time duration without food and the level of blood glucose (r = -0.33, P = 0.08; n = 30).
In RDD an almost significant May peak (OR=1.04, 95%CI=0.99–1.1, p=0.08) and a significant November deficit (OR=0.93, 95%CI=0.88–0.99, p=0.02) were observed.
Using Multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard regression with the factors resynchronization and CSR, the effect of resynchronization was almost significant ( p = 0.08).
A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction revealed that the difference between the immediate and the delayed condition was almost significant for the explicit measure ( P = 0.08), but not for the implicit one ( P = 0.25).
Almost significant group by time interactions were observed for body mass ( p = 0.08, ES = 0.23) and body mass index ( p = 0.054, ES = 0.27).
Inpatient Utilization The unadjusted comparisons of changes over time in the use of inpatient services indicate a significant increase ( p < 0.01) in the number of mental health admissions in the prepaid group during the study period, and an almost significant increase ( p < 0.08) in the probability of a prepaid group member having a chemical dependency admission ( Table 7 ).
Subgroup analysis revealed that a significant improvement in PFS ( p = 0.03) and an almost significant OS ( p = 0.08) could be achieved in previously treated BMs when analysis was restricted to patients receiving a combination of dabrafenib and trametinib and patients with BRAFV600K (Val600Lys) mutation.
Within didactic instruction, low reasoners had higher reasoning gains within heterogeneous groups ( n = 5, M homogeneous = 2.20; n = 12, M heterogeneous = 6.00; F = 3.39, p = 0.08; note: differences were almost significant).
There was no interaction ( F 1,8 = 0.45, p = 0.52). The number of mistakes made was not affected by the experience of chasing ( F 1,8 = 0.11, p = 0.92), but the effect of experiencing enrichment was almost significant ( F 1,8 = 4.16, p = 0.08).
No significant difference was observed in the onset-to-door time between the two groups (p = 0.97), whereas an almost significant difference was observed in the door-to-picture time (p = 0.08).
The interaction between strain and coinfection was almost significant (Fig. 2 ; p = 0.080) and we therefore split the analysis by strain.
Curiously, a significant volumetric difference between the left (mean = 5198 mm 3 , SD = 495.0) and the right thalamus (mean = 4946 mm 3 , SD = 590.6) was found in patients with nonpainful DPN ( P < 0.01), which contributed to an almost significant left–right volumetric difference in the entire sample of patients with type 1 DM and DPN ( P = 0.08).
On the contrary, an almost significant negative correlation was observed for the sprouting of mECs, (as shown in Fig. 3C : r 2 = 0.67, p = 0.08), suggesting a lower angiogenic potential in mECs derived from patients with higher systemic inflammation (Fig. 3f ).
When matched based on absolute 100 m PRs, a smaller and almost significant ( p = 0.08) reduction of 17.7% was observed ( Table 4 ).
Indeed, the Task by Session by Group interaction was almost significant ( F 1,57 = 2.65, P = 0.08), whereby response times during the PASST decreased more after cathodal stimulation (1509 vs. 1322 msec), than after anodal (1491 vs. 1427 msec) or sham (1504 vs. 1427 msec) stimulation.
Increases in subsequent intervals were smaller, but resulted in an almost significant increase in length between 40° and 120° (9% over combined intervals; p = 0.08 after Bonferroni Correction).
In multivariable analysis, preprocedural posterior leaflet height (PLH) (OR 0.16, p = 0.02) and immediate postprocedural MR degree (IPOMR) (OR 12.4, p = 0.03) were predictive; preprocedural Ejection Fraction (EF) was almost significant (OR 0.87, p = 0.08) (Figure 1).
The variable DD was almost significant ( p = 0.08 # ).
Being German was almost significant (OR 9.25, P =.08); however, the confidence interval has a significant range and there were only 6 German participants: an equal split of 3 German participants in each group.