Barely Significant
← all phrases

“almost significant”

1,859 sentences · 1,859 papers · 2,306 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The ANOVA for the mapping-repetition group showed a significant main effect of transition condition ( F (1, 22) = 16.8; MSE = 721; p < 0.001) and an almost significant main effect of transition subgroup (compatible mapping/incompatible mapping) ( F (1, 22) = 4.0; MSE = 19,588; p = 0.06), that was due to shorter reaction times for the subgroup with the compatible mapping (493 vs. 574 ms).
Action planning with two-handed tools.
Psychol Res · 2009 · PMC2708334
almost significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Social support measures showed completers had significantly higher affection support (completers: M = 3.93; withdrawals: M = 3, P = 0.047), higher positive social interaction scores (completers: M = 7.24; withdrawals: M = 5, P = 0.005), and higher and almost significant overall social support (completers: M = 32.52; withdrawals: M = 26.5, P = 0.06).
almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
However, by separating the glands into two parts with the top composed of pit and isthmus and the bottom composed of neck and base, we observed an almost significant ( p = 0.06) decrease in nuclear positive cells in the neck and base of H. pylori positive tissue compared to non-infected tissue ( Figure 6 B).
almost significantp =0.061.2× alphagold
The event-free survival probability for brain infarction according to serum ALP levels was almost significant across the tertiles (log-rank test, p =0.06) ( Fig.4 ) , but there was no significant difference in the incidence of brain infarction among the tertiles according to multivariable-adjusted risks ( Table 3 ) or multivariable-adjusted restricted cubic spline analysis ( Fig.5 ) .
almost significantP = 0·061.2× alphagold
There was no significant difference in the final weights of the fish between the diet groups ( P = 0·16); however, there was a moderately lower SGR of 1·87 in the 10 % VLC-Conc1 diet group compared with SGR of 2·17 in the control group with 0 % VLC-PUFA ( P = 0·04), and an almost significant difference in TGC between the diet groups ( P = 0·06).
almost significantp=0.061.2× alphagold
The other two RCTs investigating a low-caloric diet on psoriasis severity did not show significant beneficial effects when compared to no dietary intervention, although the difference in mean PASI change between the low-caloric diet group and control group was almost significant in favor of the low-caloric diet (−2.3 vs −0.3, resp. p=0.06) in the Jensen study (n=60, non-blinded). 29 , 31 Del Giglio (blinded RCT) investigated whether a low-caloric diet (n=22) was able to maintain disease remission after methotrexate (MTX) treatment compared to no dietary intervention (n=20). 29 Mean PASI at the end of the study was not significantly different between the low-caloric group and the control group, but a trend in favor of the low-caloric group was seen.
almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In terms of the pets’ pruritus over the six weeks, and comparing the animals receiving the treatment as directed with those not receiving, there were significant differences between the two groups in the reported pruritus at the third week of treatment (t = 2.07, p = 0.04), being almost significant by the sixth week ( p = 0.06), i.e., dogs receiving treatment as prescribed improved sooner than those not receiving as directed.